Teams

BC-MCC/NahiaHossain

2023 Adult 40 & Over - Beach Cities · BC Women - 3.0

17 players · average NTRP 3.14 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for BC Women - 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Caroline Payne
published 3.5
3.24
Amanda West
published 3.5
2.95
Nissa Diederich
published
2.94
2.93
Donna Hughes
published
2.77
Alicia Greene
published 3
2.77
Shelby Campion
published
Dana Leyland
published 3
2.69
2.53
Cindy Emanuel
published 3
2.50
Linda Buchanan
published
2.49
Elizabeth Mann
published
2.49
Candice Maloney
published 3
2.44
Nahia Hossain
published
2.39
Staci Carey
published
Julie Fields
published
Wendy Stillman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Candice Maloney + Staci Carey3537% gamesnot enough data
Amanda West + Caroline Payne213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Caroline Payne
12W–8L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Amanda West
13W–25L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.24
Nissa Diederich
10W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%65%35%
2.95
Kristine Marlborough
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
2.94
Donna Hughes
3W–8L career · no lines in 2023
69%31%<1%
2.93
3
Alicia Greene
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
2.77
Shelby Campion
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Dana Leyland
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Cambria McCulloch
11W–10L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Cindy Emanuel
17W–29L career · no lines in 2023
40%60%<1%
2.53
Linda Buchanan
0W–7L career · no lines in 2023
51%49%<1%
2.50
Elizabeth Mann
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
53%47%<1%
2.49
3
Candice Maloney
3W–10L career · no lines in 2023
53%47%<1%
2.49
Nahia Hossain
8W–19L career · no lines in 2023
68%32%<1%
2.44
Staci Carey
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
78%22%<1%
2.39
Julie Fields
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Wendy Stillman
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.