Teams

Shalimar Pointe-Dunworth

2022 OWB Mixed 18 & Over · 8.0 Mixed 18 & Over

6 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_1

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-08-21vs Edgewater-BachmanWon 10
W#2 DoublesPaul Harris / Dianna Dylewski vs Todd Zaborski / Van Hughes6-2, 6-2
2022-08-21vs Edgewater-BachmanWon 10
W#1 DoublesKati Hill / Victor Otero vs Brandon Bachman / Van Hughes6-0, 7-5
L#2 DoublesKati Hill / Victor Otero vs Byron Cotton / Wendy Barbary3-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDale Rice / Dianna Dylewski vs Lance Waddy / Akiko Ichimasa3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKati Hill / Paul Harris vs Tricia Hafdahl / Philip Hafdahl3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-07-24vs Edgewater-BachmanLost 02
L#1 DoublesDianna Dylewski / Paul Harris vs Tina Phillips / Michael Johns0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKati Hill / Victor Otero vs Ashley Edmonds / Sean McKeague2-6, 4-6
2022-07-24vs Edgewater-BachmanSplit 11
L#2 DoublesDianna Dylewski / Paul Harris vs Van Hughes / Sean McKeague6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKati Hill / Victor Otero vs Carlye Zaborski / Todd Zaborski6-4, 6-4
L#1 DoublesVictor Otero / Kati Hill vs Byron Cotton / Akiko Ichimasa6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDianna Dylewski / Paul Harris vs Tricia Hafdahl / Philip Hafdahl3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesVictor Otero / Kati Hill vs Lubomir Kaderjak / Alicia Roberson2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Mixed 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.89 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.24
Kim Pennington
published
4.15
Kevin Dunworth
published
4.00
Gregory Bennett
published 4.5
3.86
Kati Hill
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.61
Dianna Dylewski
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.45
Paul Harris
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dianna Dylewski + Paul Harris134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kim Pennington
6W–2L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
4.24
Kevin Dunworth
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
4.15
4.5
Gregory Bennett
1W–9L career · no lines in 2022
50%50%<1%
4.00
3.5
Kati Hill
50W–30L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%<1%>99%
3.86
4
Dianna Dylewski
50W–38L career · 5 lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.61
Paul Harris
33W–52L career · 5 lines in 2022
66%34%<1%
3.45

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.