Teams

SHR:Shrewsbury Aces:Dronova/Devarajan

2025 EMA Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

13 players · average NTRP 3.25 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-05-09vs MLT:West:Wolfpack:WolfLost 12
L#1 DoublesMacKenzie DeMur / Uday Kumar Singari vs David Sammuli / Ann-Marie Hayes6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesIrina Dronova / Victor Ruiz vs Bruce Rachman / Sara Misch4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesNaveen Kumar / Riley Hennessy vs Anne Mullaney / Jim Papalia6-2, 6-2
L#1 DoublesCindya Susan Cherian / Tamiliniyan Devarajan vs Hailey Longbottom / Matt Allard3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesVi Cooper / Mak Khan vs Monica Rogers / Wuck Foo Wong4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesVannepha Luangaphay / Albert Grankin vs Maureen Obrien / Maximilian Pschorr6-3, 6-3
2025-03-28vs WESB:Westboro:Khuu/WaungWon 21
L#1 DoublesVannepha Luangaphay / Naveen Kumar vs Nicholas Sushkin / Julie Hanson6-7, 4-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRiley Hennessy / Uday Kumar Singari vs Quentin Palfrey / Chris Cawley6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMacKenzie DeMur / Victor Ruiz vs Jean Norman-Clancy / Kshitij Kathuria6-4, 6-1
2025-03-14vs NETC:New England TC Green:WelcomWon 21
W#1 DoublesCindya Susan Cherian / Tamiliniyan Devarajan vs Bharath Padala / Srilatha Pellakuru6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesVi Cooper / Mak Khan vs Genoveva Mateeva / Paul Forcina6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesIrina Dronova / Uday Kumar Singari vs Raquel Oliveira / John Pietras4-6, 5-4, 0-1
2025-02-28vs MLT:West:Wolfpack:WolfLost 12
L#1 DoublesMacKenzie DeMur / Umesh Kurpad vs Mark Desrochers / Andrea Pickersgill4-6, 3-5
W#2 DoublesVi Cooper / Mak Khan vs Paul Pickersgill / Jennifer Aufiero6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesIrina Dronova / Evan Glass vs Jill Wolf / Michael Miller2-6, 6-7
2025-02-14vs NETC:New England TC Green:WelcomWon 30
W#1 DoublesCindya Susan Cherian / Victor Ruiz vs Andrea Paez / Sergio Paez6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesVi Cooper / Tamiliniyan Devarajan vs Elaine Chin / Ryan Massimino6-4, 4-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMacKenzie DeMur / Uday Kumar Singari vs Emma Collings / Steven Soares6-1, 7-5
W#1 DoublesCindya Susan Cherian / Victor Ruiz vs Mickey Donahue / Dinesh Yogaratnam6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesRiley Hennessy / Edward Feeney vs Andrew Andrianopoulos / Hailey Longbottom7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesIrina Dronova / Evan Glass vs Maureen Obrien / Alex Suyer6-3, 7-6
2025-01-17vs WESB:Westboro:Khuu/WaungLost 03
L#1 DoublesMak Khan / Cindya Susan Cherian vs Edward Arous / Michelle Mullins3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesTamiliniyan Devarajan / Irina Dronova vs Betsy Costello / Leonard ONeil3-6, 4-5
L#3 DoublesMacKenzie DeMur / Albert Grankin vs Chris Cawley / Neil Proulx3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings30 teams · 7.0 Mixed
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Tamiliniyan Devarajan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.46
Vannepha Luangaphay
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Albert Grankin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Uday Kumar Singari
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.18
Umesh Kurpad
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Irina Dronova
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
Cindya Susan Cherian
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Edward Feeney
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Evan Glass
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
MacKenzie DeMur
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Mak Khan
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Naveen Kumar
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Vi Cooper
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Evan Glass + Irina Dronova2446% gamesnot enough data
Mak Khan + Vi Cooper213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tamiliniyan Devarajan
29W–26L career · 4 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.63
Vannepha Luangaphay
8W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Albert Grankin
2W–17L career · type M · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Uday Kumar Singari
8W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Umesh Kurpad
8W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Irina Dronova
38W–95L career · 8 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Cindya Susan Cherian
20W–14L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Edward Feeney
97W–83L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Evan Glass
4W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
MacKenzie DeMur
15W–13L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mak Khan
13W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Naveen Kumar
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Vi Cooper
8W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.