Teams

NITA E 30W18e Health Track-Dodge/Lincoln

2025 NITA1 ESL Adult 18 & Over · NITA ESL 18 & Over 3.0 Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHERN ILLINOIS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2024-12-15vs NITA E 30W18b Five Star-SchwandtLost 03
L#1 DoublesSoni Simpson / Diana Long vs Liz Schwandt / Heather Birsinger1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesGeta Roman / Nancy Lincoln vs Ashwini Shukla / Bethany Young0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLeslie Dodge / Suzanne Boro vs Kathleen Mansour / Anuradha Ram1-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesDiana Long / Alyssa Petropoulos vs Lisa Mastin / Maureen Knox6-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesLeslie Dodge / Soni Simpson vs Julene Freund / Amelia Dantzer1-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesTina Chivardi / Diana Long vs Julie Savanelli / Susan Klosterman7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesKatie Clancy vs Tiffany Michalak2-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMichele Choi / Leslie Dodge vs Caitlin Strung / Katie Knaus0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesGeta Roman / Rebecca Falco vs Theresa Lucente / Teresa Colson1-6, 5-7
L#1 DoublesDiana Long / Maryam Sandoval vs Barbara Kleinschmidt / Melissa Klimek4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesKatie Clancy vs Rabia Ahmad6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesNancy Lincoln / Geta Roman vs Alexandra Didac / Anne Rockwell1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSuzanne Boro / Aimee Truesdell vs Karen Grasse / Marion Thompson0-6, 0-6
2024-11-03vs NITA E 30W18f Vaughan-MerrimanLost 13
L#1 DoublesHope Rodine / Michele Choi vs Angela J Randall / Kelsey Miller6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesRebecca Falco vs Monica Bykowski6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesGeta Roman / Aimee Truesdell vs Patricia Merriman / Kristi Kusak6-7, 2-3
L#3 DoublesSuzanne Boro / Julie Thompson vs Amy Heimerdinger / Katie Owens6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesDiana Long / Katie Clancy vs Loreal Leonard / Helen Tomacruz6-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesRebecca Falco vs Yumo Zou4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSoni Simpson / Julie Thompson vs Marisa Rohrer / Christina Brady4-6, 4-5
L#3 DoublesSuzanne Boro / Nancy Lincoln vs Suzanne Fallon / Courtney Hamad0-6, 1-6
2024-10-20vs NITA E 30W18b Five Star-SchwandtLost 12
W#1 DoublesKatie Clancy / Alyssa Petropoulos vs Heather Birsinger / Denise McKenna6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDiana Long / Maryam Sandoval vs Jennifer Kot / Kathleen Mansour6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesNancy Lincoln / Aimee Truesdell vs Ashwini Shukla / Lauren Cangilla1-6, 0-6
W#1 DoublesKatie Clancy / Alyssa Petropoulos vs Sharon Jerndt / Emily Duerr6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesHope Rodine vs Alba Lane6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDiana Long / Rebecca Falco vs Maro Gessell / Julene Freund7-6, 5-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLeslie Dodge / Amanda McCarthy vs Peggy Roeske / Janet Miller4-6, 6-5
L#1 DoublesAlyssa Petropoulos / Diana Long vs JennI Stull / Kolleen Mooren3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesNancy Lincoln vs Nicole Lintner0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLeslie Dodge / Maryam Sandoval vs Elizabeth Wangler / Caitlin Strung2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSoni Simpson / Julie Thompson vs Sarah Cast / Debbie Weisz1-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesKatie Clancy / Alyssa Petropoulos vs Lisa Obrien / Andrea Zuckerman6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRebecca Falco / Diana Long vs Karen Grasse / Cathy Gilmartin1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesNancy Lincoln / Geta Roman vs Sylvia Luchini / Melissa Klimek1-6, 1-6
2024-09-15vs NITA E 30W18f Vaughan-MerrimanWon 21
W#1 DoublesKatie Clancy / Alyssa Petropoulos vs Kristi Kusak / Patricia Merriman6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSoni Simpson / Diana Long vs Amy Heimerdinger / Brenda Jennings-Lim0-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesMaryam Sandoval / Geta Roman vs Shannon Enorense / Alison Bergin6-2, 6-3
L#1 DoublesKatie Clancy / Hope Rodine vs Helen Tomacruz / Loreal Leonard4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDiana Long / Alyssa Petropoulos vs Brianna Keane / Linda Blomquist2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLeslie Dodge / Nancy Lincoln vs Courtney Hamad / Camille Rhoades1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · NITA ESL 18 & Over 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NITA E 30W18c Courts Plus-Savanelli92291534314
2NITA E 30W18b Five Star-Schwandt83321230261
3NITA E 30W18a Courts Plus-Grasse/Milkowski84331534312
4NITA E 30W18d Five Star-Fallon/Klepper84311739330
5NITA E 30W18g Rush Copley-Mastin/Jerndt39173164468
6NITA E 30W18e Health Track-Dodge/Lincoln39133573479
7NITA E 30W18f Vaughan-Merriman21093981532

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.59 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.96
Katie Clancy
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.80
Tina Chivardi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Aimee Truesdell
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Alyssa Petropoulos
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3
Amanda McCarthy
published 3
Diana Long
published 3
2.75
Rebecca Falco
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.59
Geta Roman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.27
Suzanne Boro
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.14
Nancy Lincoln
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Elizabeth McDonald
published
Hope Rodine
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Leslie Dodge
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Maryam Sandoval
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Michele Choi
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Soni Simpson
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alyssa Petropoulos + Katie Clancy4261% games+18.4% vs expected
Nancy Lincoln + Suzanne Boro0717% games−12.4% vs expected
Nancy Lincoln + Geta Roman0615% games−15.1% vs expected
Leslie Dodge + Soni Simpson1427% games−20.7% vs expected
Diana Long + Katie Clancy134 matchesnot enough data
Katie Clancy + Hope Rodine314 matchesnot enough data
Alyssa Petropoulos + Maryam Sandoval213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katie Clancy
24W–24L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
2.96
3
Tina Chivardi
22W–34L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
2.80
3
Aimee Truesdell
1W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Alyssa Petropoulos
12W–19L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Amanda McCarthy
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Diana Long
5W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rebecca Falco
16W–19L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
Geta Roman
2W–11L career · 6 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
2.59
Suzanne Boro
0W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
95%5%<1%
2.27
Nancy Lincoln
5W–32L career · 7 lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
2.14
Elizabeth McDonald
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Hope Rodine
9W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Leslie Dodge
4W–25L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Maryam Sandoval
9W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michele Choi
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Soni Simpson
3W–13L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.