Teams

YMCA TNT-Nankivel

2024 Fredericksburg Mixed 40 & Over · Fredericksburg Mixed 40 & Over 7.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.40 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-07-13vs UMW Detonators-BillupsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDorota Sipko / Bill Thomas vs Carrie Seifert / Kay Adjei7-5, 6-0
L#3 DoublesJudith Jobrack / Tang Subkanha vs Melissa Hutcheson / Bahram Solhjou0-6, 6-2, 0-1
2024-06-22vs UMW Detonators-BillupsWon 10
W#2 DoublesDavid Hyman / Judith Jobrack vs Trent Billups / Susan Button6-3, 6-4
2024-06-13vs UMW Detonators-BillupsWon 10
W#1 DoublesQ Pennings / Judith Jobrack vs Trent Billups / Megan Roberge3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-06-08vs UMW Detonators-BillupsSplit 11
L#2 DoublesDavid Hyman / Judith Jobrack vs Kay Adjei / Melissa Hutcheson4-6, 6-0, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBill Thomas / Dorota Sipko vs Aldo Villalobos / Carrie Seifert6-0, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fredericksburg Mixed 40 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Bill Thomas
published 4
3.61
Jason Gordon
published
3.46
Q Pennings
published
3.31
Dorota Sipko
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.27
Lorrie Roberts
published
David Bryant
published 3.5
3.15
Jonathan Marcus
published
3.01
Lisa Alpert
published
Carlene Gordon
published 3
2.74
Judith Jobrack
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Pat Gillespie
published
Rachael Day
published
Tang Subkanha
published
Tracey Nankivel
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jason Gordon + Judith Jobrack404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bill Thomas
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
Jason Gordon
14W–11L career · no lines in 2024
22%77%<1%
3.61
Q Pennings
6W–2L career · no lines in 2024
62%38%<1%
3.46
3.5
Dorota Sipko
163W–91L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
Lorrie Roberts
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
David Bryant
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jonathan Marcus
11W–20L career · no lines in 2024
14%86%1%
3.15
Lisa Alpert
5W–13L career · no lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
3.01
3
Carlene Gordon
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Judith Jobrack
72W–90L career · 4 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
2.74
Pat Gillespie
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Rachael Day
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tang Subkanha
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tracey Nankivel
4W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.