Teams

Yadkin/Whitman/18+6.5 Combo

2026 Yadkin Valley Combo 18 & Over · Men 6.5 - Thursday Nights

11 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 upcoming · 2 played
Sep 10 6:30 PM
Wake Forest University
Sep 17 6:30 PM
Wake Forest University
Sep 24 6:30 PM
Wake Forest University
Oct 1 6:30 PM
Tanglewood Community Tennis Center
Oct 8 6:30 PM
Wake Forest University
Oct 15 6:30 PM
Willow Creek Clubhouse
2026-08-20vs Yadkin/Araujo-Howard/18+6.5Won 30
W#1 DoublesDean Burkhalter / Bradin Routh vs Derek Radney / David Crews6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAustin Temple / Matthew Whitman vs Paul Howard / Manas Mishra6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMatt Craver / Nathan Ayers vs Daniel Alvarez / Steven Gallo6-4, 6-2
2026-08-13vs Yadkin/Clay/18+6.5 ComboLost 03
L#1 DoublesChad Riesett / Bradin Routh vs Daniel Johnson / Lyle Paukner5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMatt Craver / Tory Wagoner vs Aravindh Raj Sankara Narayanan / Scott Smyre4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesNathan Ayers / Matthew Whitman vs Jeff Clay / Blake Suess6-4, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · Men 6.5 - Thursday Nights
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Yadkin/Clay/18+6.5 Combo2060344
2Yadkin/Araujo-Howard/18+6.51030121
3Yadkin/Whitman/18+6.5 Combo0103636
4Yadkin/Mays/Willow Creek/18+6.502061270

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Chad Riesett
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.33
Dean Burkhalter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.28
Matt Craver
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.27
Austin Temple
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Matthew Whitman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.23
Nathan Ayers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Tory Wagoner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Bradin Routh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.12
Tj Buckley
published
3.05
2.65
Dylan Adams
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nathan Ayers + Matthew Whitman4356% games+4.7% vs expected
Chad Riesett + Matthew Whitman1441% gamesnot enough data
Matthew Whitman + Tory Wagoner314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Chad Riesett
4W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Dean Burkhalter
14W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
Matt Craver
4W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Austin Temple
15W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
Matthew Whitman
26W–21L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%5%95%
3.23
Nathan Ayers
23W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%5%95%
3.23
Tory Wagoner
25W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%9%91%
3.19
3
Bradin Routh
23W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%10%90%
3.18
Tj Buckley
8W–17L career · no lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.12
Gai Sai Kiran Paladugu
4W–7L career · no lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
3.05
Dylan Adams
4W–13L career · no lines in 2026
15%85%1%
2.65

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.