Teams

Love

2026 FW Combo Tournament · 7.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.75 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-05-24vs NegronWon 21
L#1 DoublesRick Meisel / Michael Love vs Jose Andrade / Matt Chehab0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesBrian Ownby / Blake Halpern vs Ricardo Negron / Kul Shekhar6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBryan Disney / Tarun Nadimpalli vs Colby Hudson / Allan Wilson6-2, 6-3
2026-05-23vs NegronWon 30
W#1 DoublesLandon Love / Tarun Nadimpalli vs Edgar Ayala / Matt Chehab6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRick Meisel / Blake Halpern vs Allan Wilson / Daniel Zamora6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesBryan Disney / Bobby Reeves vs Ricardo Negron / Jose Andrade6-1, 7-5
2026-05-23vs NegronWon 30
W#1 DoublesRick Meisel / Blake Halpern vs Edgar Ayala / Daniel Zamora6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBobby Reeves / Michael Love vs Kul Shekhar / Colby Hudson6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesBrian Ownby / Tarun Nadimpalli vs Matt Chehab / Ricardo Negron7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 7.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Love3081245
2Negron03181699

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.08
Blake Halpern
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.96
Bobby Reeves
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.92
Tarun Nadimpalli
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.49
Brian Ownby
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.46
Bryan Disney
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.44
Landon Love
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
Michael Love
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.38
Rick Meisel
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Love + Rick Meisel224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Blake Halpern
28W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%28%72%
4.08
4
Bobby Reeves
23W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
3.96
Tarun Nadimpalli
14W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.92
3.5
Brian Ownby
37W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
3.49
3.5
Bryan Disney
12W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
3.46
Landon Love
29W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.44
Michael Love
26W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.43
Rick Meisel
20W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.38

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.