Teams

Valentine/18/3.0/MD/LCRC

2026 Lake Charles Adult 18 & Over - Men · 3.0 LC (18&O) Men

11 players · average NTRP 2.90 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-05-10vs Taylor/18/3.0/MD/LCRCWon 30
W#1 DoublesJeffrey Davis / Chris Etherton vs Hiren Zaveri / Matt Forest6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesNathanial Washington / Carson Valentine vs Craig Manuel / Jiten Zaveri6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMark Valentine / Mitch Redd vs Dusty Taylor / Craig Doland3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-05-03vs Meaux/18/3.0/MD/LCRCLost 14
L#1 DoublesChris Etherton / Aaron Fast vs Andrew Kohler / Scott Ogden0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesAndre Walker vs Cameron Landry0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesNathan Morrow / Layton Pryor vs Taylor Gagneaux / Garett Istre1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesConnor Latour vs Derek Poncho2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMark Valentine / Nathanial Washington vs Jared Meaux / Matt Beaugh6-3, 6-3
2026-04-12vs Benoit/18/3.0/MD/LCRCLost 14
L#1 DoublesNathan Morrow / Layton Pryor vs Braxton Benoit / Maxwell Fetzer6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesConnor Latour vs Brandon Broussard2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAndre Walker / Nathanial Washington vs Steven Bordelon / Robert Jorden Iii6-3, 7-5
L#2 SinglesCarson Valentine vs Sam Smith0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTodd Melton / Mark Valentine vs Nickolas Maskas / Anthony Bertrand5-7, 2-6
2026-03-29vs Meaux/18/3.0/MD/LCRCLost 05
L#1 DoublesAaron Fast / Jeffrey Davis vs Bransen Stout / Matt Beaugh2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesLayton Pryor vs Cameron Landry6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesChris Etherton / Nathan Morrow vs Dean Padgett Jr / Garett Istre1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesAndre Walker vs Andrew Kohler6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesNathanial Washington / Mitch Redd vs Jared Meaux / Taylor Gagneaux4-6, 1-6
2026-03-22vs Benoit/18/3.0/MD/LCRCLost 23
W#1 DoublesAaron Fast / Chris Etherton vs Maxwell Fetzer / Nickolas Maskas6-1, 6-3
L#1 SinglesNathan Morrow vs Jandre Rademeyer2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMark Valentine / Carson Valentine vs Braxton Benoit / Anthony Bertrand6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesAndre Walker vs Brandon Broussard4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesConnor Latour / Todd Melton vs Blake Lumpkin / Steven Bordelon6-4, 6-3
2026-03-08vs Taylor/18/3.0/MD/LCRCWon 41
W#1 DoublesLayton Pryor / Carson Valentine vs Hiren Zaveri / Dustin Granger6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesNathanial Washington vs Wilson Gomez6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMark Valentine / Todd Melton vs Dusty Taylor / Craig Doland4-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesChris Etherton vs Will Arceneaux6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJeffrey Davis / Mitch Redd vs Michael Williamson / John Schnake6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 3.0 LC (18&O) Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Meaux/18/3.0/MD/LCRC6028210153
2Benoit/18/3.0/MD/LCRC42181227224
3Valentine/18/3.0/MD/LCRC24111939283
4Taylor/18/3.0/MD/LCRC0632754325

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.61 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.86
Layton Pryor
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
2.73
Connor Latour
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.68
Nathanial Washington
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.68
Chris Etherton
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.68
Aaron Fast
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.64
Andre Walker
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.63
Todd Melton
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.55
Mark Valentine
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.49
Mitch Redd
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.39
Nathan Morrow
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.33
Carson Valentine
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carson Valentine + Mark Valentine224 matchesnot enough data
Mark Valentine + Todd Melton134 matchesnot enough data
Mitch Redd + Todd Melton224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Layton Pryor
15W–13L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
2.86
3
Connor Latour
2W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
Nathanial Washington
12W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Chris Etherton
10W–23L career · 5 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Aaron Fast
8W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Andre Walker
5W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
2.64
Todd Melton
13W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
2.63
Mark Valentine
13W–17L career · 5 lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
2.55
Mitch Redd
9W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
52%48%<1%
2.49
Nathan Morrow
11W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
78%22%<1%
2.39
2.5
Carson Valentine
5W–4L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
0%88%12%
2.33

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.