Teams

CSU GREEN

2025 TRIO - NOCO · WOMEN 3.0 - TRIO - NOCO

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-04-26vs FCCC REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesJaylin Garcia / Jamie Heckman vs Jana Burns / Victoria Archer5-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesBethany Chambers vs Emily Eiten3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesShannon Bigner / Audrie Diel vs Teresa Nugent / Ashley McLaughlin6-0, 6-2
2025-04-19vs TAG ORANGEWon 20
W#1 DoublesTiffany Croci / Bethany Chambers vs Amy Herold / Rachel Baldwin6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesJamie Heckman / Shannon Bigner vs Melissa Dalton / Jennifer Borg6-3, 6-4
2025-04-12vs LT BRONZEWon 21
W#1 DoublesCarolyn Schultz-Walter / Bethany Chambers vs Lee Anne Kempton / Caitlyn Reid4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesHolly Rodriguez vs Carolyn Everhart6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJamie Heckman / Shannon Bigner vs Janet Krech / Shirley Moore5-7, 0-6
2025-04-05vs FCCC BLUEWon 30
W#1 DoublesAudrie Diel / Amy Molina vs Jane Roberti / Nicole Holmes6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesTiffany Croci vs Allison Osthoff6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesHolly Rodriguez / Jaylin Garcia vs Denise Benz / Shannon Holt6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - TRIO - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
Bethany Chambers
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.94
Audrie Diel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Carolyn Schultz-Walter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Shannon Bigner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Amy Molina
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.72
Jamie Heckman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.67
Tiffany Croci
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.65
Holly Rodriguez
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.56
Jaylin Garcia
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.40
Wendy Sprague
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Holly Rodriguez + Jamie Heckman134 matchesnot enough data
Jamie Heckman + Carolyn Schultz-Walter224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Bethany Chambers
67W–37L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%31%69%
3.07
3
Audrie Diel
17W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
2.94
3
Carolyn Schultz-Walter
4W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3
Shannon Bigner
41W–62L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Amy Molina
3W–7L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
4%93%3%
2.75
Jamie Heckman
10W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Tiffany Croci
23W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
Holly Rodriguez
9W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
2.65
Jaylin Garcia
4W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
2.56
Wendy Sprague
3W–24L career · no lines in 2025
76%24%<1%
2.40

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.