Teams

Team 4 Dare Doubles

2024 NOVA Mixed 18 & Over · NOVA Mixed 18 & Over 6.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-03-02vs Team 1 Net DancersWon 10
W#2 DoublesRobert Evans / Mary Tisch vs Jun Chang / Caixia Che4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-02-29vs Team 2 Love & Learn TennisWon 10
W#3 DoublesJohn Bartling / Mary Tisch vs JEANETTE SARAIVA / Alberto Zapata7-5, 5-2
2024-02-18vs Team 3 YangWon 10
W#1 DoublesThomas Murphy / Linda Oberleitner vs Hongyangyang Shi / Qian Sheng3-6, 5-5
2024-02-15vs Team 2 Love & Learn TennisLost 01
L#3 DoublesRobert Evans / Mary Tisch vs Alberto Zapata / JEANETTE SARAIVA2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2024-02-03vs Team 3 YangWon 10
W#1 DoublesDon Kim / Mary Tisch vs Benoit Kroely / Hazel Yang6-1, 6-2
2024-01-27Lost 01
L#2 DoublesRobert Evans / Linda Hoffman vs Kurt Castro / DANIELLE RICHERT5-7, 1-6
2024-01-20vs Team 1 Net DancersSplit 11
L#1 DoublesFred Stein / Mary Tisch vs Rui Liu / Wanli Liu2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesThomas Murphy / Linda Oberleitner vs Jia Li / Chung-Kai Hsiao6-2, 6-4
2024-01-14vs Team 3 YangWon 10
W#3 DoublesJohn Bartling / Linda Oberleitner vs Yucong Gao / Hongyangyang Shi7-6, 2-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Mixed 18 & Over 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.67 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.90
Lyn Reid
published
2.86
Mary Tisch
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.79
Linda Oberleitner
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.73
Robert Evans
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.72
Paul Reid
published
2.55
Paula Murphy
published
2.47
John Bartling
published
2.32
Sandra Kim
published
Farhan Ayubi
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paul Reid + Lyn Reid10557% games+10.4% vs expected
Robert Evans + Mary Tisch7944% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lyn Reid
13W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%23%
2.90
3
Mary Tisch
71W–105L career · 8 lines in 2024
1%84%16%
2.86
3
Linda Oberleitner
36W–60L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Robert Evans
30W–53L career · type M · 7 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
2.73
Paul Reid
16W–11L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
2.72
Paula Murphy
0W–8L career · no lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
2.55
John Bartling
2W–8L career · no lines in 2024
58%42%<1%
2.47
Sandra Kim
18W–17L career · no lines in 2024
0%90%10%
2.32
Farhan Ayubi
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.