Teams

CPV RED

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.69 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-06-03vs PCC REDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesTracey McCarthy / Gina Lurie vs Cathy Kerkhove / Rebecca Kobayashi0-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesKelly Shadwick vs Julie Eisenrich6-4, 6-4
W#2 SinglesSandy Biley vs Rebecca Coakley6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesErica Westphal / Tanya Hunter vs Heidi Lewis / Toya Such3-6, 6-7
2021-05-27vs PRKR REDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesLisa Wiggins / Natalie Vickers vs Sabrina Alvarez / Cindy Sanders3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesErica Westphal / Donna Chan vs Keenan Young / Lana Overton-Peller6-2, 7-6
W#2 SinglesKelly Shadwick vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesTracey McCarthy / Gina Lurie vs Vera Case / Kimberly Kurban5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2021-05-20vs CCV REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesNatalie Vickers / Lisa Wiggins vs Holly Strandes / Christine Walker6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMorgan Mayoss / Erica Westphal vs Maureen Breitenbach / Betty Wang6-0, 6-1
W#2 SinglesSandy Biley vs Natalie Messersmith6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesTracey McCarthy / Gina Lurie vs Denise Debartolomeis / Debra St John1-6, 1-6
2021-05-13vs PCRK GREENWon 41
L#1 DoublesErica Westphal / Tracey McCarthy vs Kellie Shurtz / Debra Kuebler2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesSandy Biley vs Gina Roth6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDonna Chan / Bridget Moreno vs Brittany Pierson / Jacque Montgomery6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesKelly Shadwick vs Donna Dunlap3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLisa Wiggins / Darcy Hendricks vs Lesli Bruden / Judith Nelson6-1, 6-1
2021-05-06vs HRCA YELLOWSplit 11
L#2 DoublesErica Westphal / Morgan Mayoss vs Karol Stevens / Kathy Dudek1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 SinglesSandy Biley vs Leann Penland6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2021-04-29vs PRC BLUEWon 41
W#1 DoublesNatalie Vickers / Lisa Wiggins vs Claire Cofer / Stephanie Stavri6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKelly Shadwick vs Kim Addlesperger7-6, 6-0
W#2 DoublesGina Lurie / Tracey McCarthy vs Patti Cottrell / Emily Carter6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesSandy Biley vs Elizabeth Anderson6-7, 6-7
W#3 DoublesMorgan Mayoss / Erica Westphal vs Janice Nelson / Toni Payne6-2, 6-2
2021-04-22vs VCC GREENWon 31
W#1 SinglesSandy Biley vs Karen Stoughton6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesErica Westphal / Tanya Hunter vs Karen Blach / Michele Pensa6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesKelly Shadwick vs Kari Schaefer6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesTracey McCarthy / Gina Lurie vs Dawn Baranek / Tamie Walker4-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings26 teams · WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1HRCA GOLD7026922250
2BTA RED6127820260
3GAC GREEN61241127286
4LTA NAVY61241128258
5CPV RED61241129272
6CM NAVY61211433298
7KC BLACK52201537311
8LTC SILVER52152045331
9TTA BLACK43221330273
10STAP GREEN43211433288
11GR RED43191638299
12APR BLACK43191638305
13CM ORANGE43171843337
14SKY GREEN34191641338
15HRCA NAVY34181741334
16WC BLUE34142144334
17HFII GOLD34152045346
18HV BLACK34142149352
19PH GOLD25161942312
20SSH BLACK25142144314
21RMTC BLACK25122350348
22EM GOLD25122352358
23KNO NAVY16132246315
24CP BRONZE1692654379
25HW GREEN1672859375
26CACI GREEN07112453352

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Darcy Hendricks
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.62
Kelly Shadwick
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 4
3.54
Sandy Biley
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.44
Natalie Vickers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Donna Chan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Erica Westphal
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
Bridget Moreno
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Gina Lurie
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Morgan Mayoss
published
Paula Hruska
published
Tanya Hunter
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Donna Chan + Bridget Moreno5166% games+11.8% vs expected
Erica Westphal + Gina Lurie4643% games−7.2% vs expected
Erica Westphal + Morgan Mayoss213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Darcy Hendricks
11W–1L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
4
Kelly Shadwick
41W–44L career · 5 lines in 2021
18%81%<1%
3.62
4
Sandy Biley
120W–109L career · 6 lines in 2021
37%63%<1%
3.54
3.5
Natalie Vickers
90W–48L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Donna Chan
44W–32L career · 1 line in 2021
1%92%8%
3.31
3.5
Erica Westphal
83W–77L career · 7 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Bridget Moreno
12W–7L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Gina Lurie
108W–107L career · 5 lines in 2021
11%89%<1%
3.16
Morgan Mayoss
19W–19L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Paula Hruska
20W–24L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Tanya Hunter
1W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.