Teams

Ki.Durland/Brown18C

2023 Cap Combo 18 & Over · 6.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.70 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-09-18vs Le.Barter18CLost 03
L#1 DoublesKimberly Durland / Sarah Warren vs Rebecca Fisher / Kara Horton1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSarah Stevenson / Lowry Liggon vs Leigh Barter / Kyleigh Dunn3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesSarah Donovan / Catie Cunningham vs Amy Hobbs / Barbara Wilhelm6-2, 1-6, 0-1
2023-09-14Won 10
W#3 DoublesKimberly Durland / Lowry Liggon vs Christine Peterson / Claire Owens6-1, 6-2
2023-08-28vs Je.Anderson18C6.5Split 11
L#1 DoublesCatie Cunningham / Leslie Weaver vs Melanie Hewitt / Karen Hagens4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKimberly Durland / Lowry Liggon vs Peggy Williams / Carrie Struble6-2, 6-4
2023-08-26vs St.Moritz18CWon 20
W#1 DoublesRachel Brown / Lowry Liggon vs Nancy Gugliotta / Keri Urwin7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLeslie Weaver / Catie Cunningham vs Pamela Spell / Leslie Wright6-3, 6-2
2023-08-21vs Li.Kempf18CWon 10
W#1 DoublesLeslie Weaver / Lowry Liggon vs Heather Tuttle / Christina Jenkins7-6, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.99
Melissa DeLorme
published 4
3.83
Lowry Liggon
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.61
Rachel Brown
published
3.23
Kimberly Durland
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Sarah Donovan
published
3.10
Carole Anne Hussey
published 3.5
3.04
Catie Cunningham
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.98
Ingrid Holscher
published
2.59
Melanie Gill
published
Jerri Lemanski
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kimberly Durland + Lowry Liggon213 matchesnot enough data
Lowry Liggon + Melissa DeLorme303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Melissa DeLorme
87W–42L career · no lines in 2023
<1%52%48%
3.99
4
Lowry Liggon
134W–36L career · 8 lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.83
Rachel Brown
13W–12L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.61
3.5
Kimberly Durland
208W–189L career · 3 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
Sarah Donovan
10W–8L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Carole Anne Hussey
3W–12L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Catie Cunningham
98W–63L career · type A · 8 lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.04
Ingrid Holscher
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
55%45%<1%
2.98
Melanie Gill
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
26%73%<1%
2.59
Jerri Lemanski
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.