Teams

Alschlager

2024 Adult 55 & OVER EARLY START · 7.0 Men (Thur PM)

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-12-14vs Ledray: No FaultsWon 10
W#2 DoublesMark Cooper / William Kolstad vs Mike Hicks / Paul Holten6-2, 7-5
2023-11-30vs Hassenstab - Fed ExpressLost 01
L#1 DoublesWilliam Kolstad / Tom Larson vs Carl Johanson / Michael Trangle4-6, 4-4
2023-11-15vs Carnahan Northern LightsLost 01
L#2 DoublesWilliam Kolstad / Stephen MacLennan vs Eric Dieperink / Qisuo Chen7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2023-11-02vs Hassenstab - Fed ExpressWon 10
W#3 DoublesWilliam Kolstad / Stephen MacLennan vs Steven Bucher / James Duboulay6-4, 6-2
2023-10-26vs Carnahan Northern LightsLost 01
L#1 DoublesStephen MacLennan / William Kolstad vs Paul Bennett / Tom Henjum4-6, 1-6
2023-10-05vs Carnahan Northern LightsLost 01
L#2 DoublesWilliam Kolstad / Tom Larson vs Mike Seats / Kevin Nosbisch6-3, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Men (Thur PM) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Tom Larson
published
3.39
David Wiggins
published 3.5
3.39
William Kolstad
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.32
Bob Christiansen
published 3.5
3.27
Jim Schwier
published
3.23
Keith Abrahamson
published
3.15
Mark Alschlager
published
Dyne Stephenson
published
Jungyong Park
published
Stephen MacLennan
published
Tu Van
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jungyong Park + David Wiggins5062% gamesnot enough data
William Kolstad + Jungyong Park404 matchesnot enough data
Bob Christiansen + Jim Schwier134 matchesnot enough data
William Kolstad + Mark Alschlager123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tom Larson
25W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
David Wiggins
14W–3L career · type A · no lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.39
William Kolstad
130W–83L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Bob Christiansen
40W–38L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
Jim Schwier
9W–7L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
Keith Abrahamson
13W–13L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%2%
3.23
Mark Alschlager
16W–23L career · no lines in 2024
14%86%1%
3.15
Dyne Stephenson
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jungyong Park
20W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Stephen MacLennan
5W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tu Van
5W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.