Teams

LCHamel/River Run

2023 Lake USTA 40 & Over League · Women 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-05-06vs LWGoodwin/3.5 Sat 40+Split 11
L#1 DoublesDana Kampschror / Carol Hamel vs Cindy Japec / Becky Kumar6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesBeth Schleck / Amanda Obrien vs Kathy Murphy / Wendy Goodwin6-1, 6-1
2023-05-05vs LWGoodwin/3.5 Sat 40+Won 10
W#3 DoublesCarol Hamel / Amanda Obrien vs Wendy Goodwin / Kathy Murphy6-2, 6-2
2023-04-29vs LWGoodwin/3.5 Sat 40+Lost 02
L#1 DoublesCarol Hamel / Tracy Keill vs Cindy Japec / Noreen Soos6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJoanne Cunningham / Beth Schleck vs Cindy Mexcur / Brenda Jandebeur7-6, 5-7, 0-1
2023-04-16vs LWGoodwin/3.5 Sat 40+Lost 01
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Bobb / Beth Schleck vs Becky Kumar / Lauren Herrmann5-7, 2-6
2023-04-02vs LWGoodwin/3.5 Sat 40+Split 11
W#1 DoublesCheri Thebeau / Beth Schleck vs Victoria Dallis / Margaret Dittemore6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCarol Hamel / Carol Seeber vs Cindy Japec / Noreen Soos5-7, 1-6
2023-03-18vs LWGoodwin/3.5 Sat 40+Won 10
W#2 DoublesBeth Schleck / Jackie Davis vs Becky Kumar / Lauren Herrmann7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2023-03-11vs LWGoodwin/3.5 Sat 40+Won 10
W#1 DoublesDana Kampschror / Carol Hamel vs Cindy Japec / Noreen Soos7-5, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Erin MacAulay
published
3.35
Natalie Van Epps
published
3.33
Carol Hamel
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.08
Lisa Gosling
published
3.08
Elizabeth Bobb
published
3.04
Beth Schleck
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 3
2.97
Joanne Cunningham
published
2.96
Adriane Ware
published 3.5
2.94
Teresa Meletiou
published
2.91
Cheri Thebeau
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Natalie Van Epps + Beth Schleck213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Erin MacAulay
8W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%22%
3.39
Natalie Van Epps
4W–1L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Carol Hamel
77W–48L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.33
Lisa Gosling
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.08
Elizabeth Bobb
0W–7L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.08
3
Beth Schleck
92W–75L career · 9 lines in 2023
<1%38%62%
3.04
Joanne Cunningham
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
59%41%<1%
2.97
3.5
Adriane Ware
1W–7L career · no lines in 2023
61%39%<1%
2.96
Teresa Meletiou
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
68%32%<1%
2.94
3.5
Cheri Thebeau
0W–7L career · no lines in 2023
75%25%<1%
2.91

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.