Teams

IslandWalk Hurman

2023 Sarasota Adult 40 & Over Spring Weekday · 4.0 W Tuesday

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2023-05-30vs River Strand Jumping BeenesWon 10
W#3 DoublesDeanna Allard / Barbara Belanger vs Sharyn Quiros / Valerie Grubbs3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-05-23vs LWN GillisWon 10
W#1 DoublesAna Areosa / Lorraine K McBride vs Mari-Ann Kucharek / Jenny Sherr7-6, 6-1
2023-05-16vs Payne Park Wilson-SnyderLost 03
L#1 SinglesAna Areosa vs Maria Dull6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLaura Quandt / Patricia Gregory vs Robyn Rhodes / Jane Doe6-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesConstance Duncan / Diane Crews vs Lenore Funes / Yvonne Ghilardi6-2, 5-7, 0-1
2023-05-09vs LWR EnglanderWon 10
W#2 DoublesBarbara Belanger / Jane Hurman vs Carol Kloeppel / Bernadette Waterman7-6, 6-3
2023-05-02vs Mission Valley MooneyWon 20
W#1 DoublesConnie Weiss / Ana Areosa vs Lori Clark / Angela Striffler-Pierre6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesDeanna Allard vs Halle Ghose6-4, 7-5
2023-04-25vs Payne Park No Drama MamasLost 12
L#1 DoublesConnie Weiss / Deanna Allard vs Sue Green / Cheryl Lyn6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAna Areosa vs Cristina Tomadin6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMary Schmitz / Patricia Gregory vs Tracy Mediratta / Fabiola Beckmann2-6, 4-6
2023-04-18vs Sarasota/Nicholson/40&Over4.0WLost 12
L#1 DoublesLynn Inganamort / Constance Duncan vs Karen Nicholson / Elizabeth Goelz0-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesDeanna Allard vs Betty Jo Zeigler7-5, 7-6
L#2 DoublesBarbara Belanger / Jane Hurman vs Kanjana Thomas / Lauren Larkin1-6, 2-6
2023-04-11vs Cedars Island GirlsWon 21
W#1 SinglesAna Areosa vs Vickie Miller6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesConstance Duncan / Lynn Inganamort vs Lisa Hansen / Cathy Pizzo7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesPatricia Gregory / Jane Hurman vs Kristin Knous / Alison White4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2023-04-04vs Plantation DipierroWon 20
W#1 DoublesAna Areosa / Lorraine K McBride vs Patricia Dipierro / Diane DeGurian7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLynn Inganamort / Constance Duncan vs Lesli Andrews / Janet Kramer7-5, 6-2
2023-03-28vs Laurel Oak...but did you win?Won 21
W#1 SinglesAna Areosa vs Courtney Rosenthal6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesConstance Duncan / Patricia Gregory vs Julie Sparma / Susan Scarlett0-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesDeanna Allard / Michele Stern vs Jacqueline VonKuhn / Laura Krotky6-7, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 W Tuesday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Ana Areosa
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.79
Diane Crews
published 4
3.78
Constance Duncan
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.69
Connie Weiss
published 4
3.65
Barbara Belanger
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.64
Jane Hurman
published
3.63
Deanna Allard
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 4
3.63
Lorraine K McBride
published
3.10
Laura Quandt
published
Janet McLellan
published
Lynn Inganamort
published
Mary Schmitz
published
Patricia Gregory
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deanna Allard + Constance Duncan291757% games−2.4% vs expected
Barbara Belanger + Deanna Allard11753% gamesnot enough data
Barbara Belanger + Patricia Gregory4258% gamesnot enough data
Barbara Belanger + Lorraine K McBride134 matchesnot enough data
Ana Areosa + Deanna Allard134 matchesnot enough data
Ana Areosa + Constance Duncan044 matchesnot enough data
Ana Areosa + Connie Weiss224 matchesnot enough data
Barbara Belanger + Constance Duncan213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ana Areosa
139W–118L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.89
4
Diane Crews
6W–4L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Constance Duncan
148W–117L career · 5 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Connie Weiss
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Barbara Belanger
71W–43L career · 3 lines in 2023
14%86%1%
3.65
Jane Hurman
11W–1L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%1%
3.64
4
Deanna Allard
122W–106L career · 5 lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.63
Lorraine K McBride
5W–8L career · no lines in 2023
18%81%<1%
3.63
Laura Quandt
5W–23L career · no lines in 2023
23%76%<1%
3.10
Janet McLellan
4W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lynn Inganamort
4W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mary Schmitz
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Patricia Gregory
40W–55L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.