Teams

Brookfield (Sascha Chaney)*

USTA Atlanta Summer - 18 & Over Business Women - Regular · 3.0 Women

21 players · average NTRP 3.20 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Christa Scardina
published 3.5
3.41
Kaila Little
published
3.23
Jett Denton
published
3.21
Amy McClain
published 3.5
3.13
Jeanette Dolfi
published
3.08
Heather Kennedy
published
3.05
Sarah Hailey
published
3.02
Heather Sinclair
published
3.00
Lindsay Zaccara
published
3.00
Angela Duggan
published 3.5
2.92
Maryellen Bishop
published
2.92
Lauren Perez
published
2.79
Scarlotte West
published
Dana Long
published 3
2.69
Laura Legg
published
2.55
Jaclyn Buckley
published
2.48
Susan Stone
published
2.41
Shanna Allison
published
2.00
Kelly Beeson
published
1.96
Ashley Everette
published 2.5
Sascha Chaney
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jett Denton + Christa Scardina5167% games+19.5% vs expected
Christa Scardina + Kaila Little17171% games+15.5% vs expected
Angela Duggan + Sarah Hailey7459% games+8.7% vs expected
Christa Scardina + Amy McClain8359% games+6.3% vs expected
Jett Denton + Heather Kennedy4358% games+3.2% vs expected
Laura Legg + Sascha Chaney2347% gamesnot enough data
Jett Denton + Kaila Little404 matchesnot enough data
Laura Legg + Jeanette Dolfi134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Christa Scardina
41W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.48
Kaila Little
50W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.41
Jett Denton
34W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%5%95%
3.23
3.5
Amy McClain
26W–13L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Jeanette Dolfi
46W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%18%82%
3.13
Heather Kennedy
20W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.08
Sarah Hailey
31W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.05
Heather Sinclair
35W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.02
Lindsay Zaccara
26W–19L career · no lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
3.00
3.5
Angela Duggan
27W–14L career · type A · no lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.00
Maryellen Bishop
18W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
2.92
Lauren Perez
17W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%72%27%
2.92
Scarlotte West
18W–4L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Dana Long
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Laura Legg
28W–25L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
2.69
Jaclyn Buckley
21W–12L career · no lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
2.55
Susan Stone
13W–12L career · no lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
2.48
Shanna Allison
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
0%73%27%
2.41
Kelly Beeson
3W–16L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.00
2.5
Ashley Everette
6W–14L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.96
Sascha Chaney
13W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.