Teams

Mid-Atlantic/Stone/55&Over9.0W

2025 Hampton Roads Adult 55 & Over · Hampton Roads Adult 55 & Over 9.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 4.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-08-16Won 10
W#2 DoublesBecky Oatts / Margie Ray vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-08-09vs Nissman - Wild Tennis WomenWon 10
W#1 DoublesBecky Oatts / Laurie Marshall vs Shelley Smith / Angela Gilliam6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2025-08-02vs Nissman - Wild Tennis WomenWon 10
W#2 DoublesBecky Oatts / Michelle Woodruff vs Shawen Bartol / Shelley Smith3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-07-19vs Nissman - Wild Tennis WomenWon 10
W#2 DoublesKelly Martone / Becky Oatts vs Shawen Bartol / Kathy Courage6-4, 6-4
2025-06-28vs Nissman - Wild Tennis WomenLost 01
L#1 DoublesMargie Ray / Christopher Witherspoon vs Deborah Brewster / Susan Willard0-6, 3-6
2025-06-21vs Nissman - Wild Tennis WomenWon 10
W#2 DoublesMargie Ray / Christopher Witherspoon vs Molly Nissman / Kathy Courage6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Hampton Roads Adult 55 & Over 9.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.16 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.35
Rebecca Jucksch
published
4.28
Kelly Martone
published
4.24
Shannon Heisler
published
4.23
Margie Ray
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.22
Charo Aguilar
published 4.5
4.12
Debby Levi
published 4.5
4.02
Becky Oatts
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.00
Laurie Marshall
published
3.97
Michelle Woodruff
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Becky Oatts + Margie Ray161355% games+1.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rebecca Jucksch
8W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
4.35
Kelly Martone
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
4.28
Shannon Heisler
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%2%
4.24
4.5
Margie Ray
93W–62L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
4.23
4.5
Charo Aguilar
7W–3L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
4.22
4.5
Debby Levi
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
4.12
4.5
Becky Oatts
57W–64L career · 4 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
4.02
Laurie Marshall
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
4.00
Michelle Woodruff
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
3.97

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.