Teams

Martin GSO - Tri-Level 18s 3.0/3.5/4.0W

2022 Piedmont Tri-Level 18 & Over · 3.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-07-30Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJoy Martin / Susan Omell vs Aundrea Hendley / Tracy Harlan0-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesSusan Omell / Gwen Highsmith-Quick vs Kathryn Fleihan / Sarah Vess6-2, 6-0
L#1 DoublesJoy Martin / Susan Omell vs Danielle Broadstreet / Maggie Riley4-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Sally Eagleton
published
3.63
Susan Omell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.62
Alina Vannavong
published 3.5
3.60
Joy Martin
published
3.39
3.22
Bobbie Westrick
published 3.5
3.10
Philia Leach
published
3.07
Donna Esson
published 3.5
2.61
Lynn Goldhammer
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joy Martin + Susan Omell4646% games−4.1% vs expected
Bobbie Westrick + Joy Martin1540% games−8.0% vs expected
Donna Esson + Philia Leach134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sally Eagleton
20W–10L career · no lines in 2022
64%36%<1%
3.95
4
Susan Omell
189W–248L career · 3 lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.63
3.5
Alina Vannavong
57W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%17%83%
3.62
Joy Martin
56W–80L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.60
3.5
Gwen Highsmith-Quick
4W–17L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.39
3.5
Bobbie Westrick
26W–38L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.22
Philia Leach
25W–22L career · no lines in 2022
<1%22%78%
3.10
3.5
Donna Esson
10W–29L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.07
3
Lynn Goldhammer
21W–81L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
2.61

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.