Teams

Brevard - RCCB / Simmons

2021 Brevard Mixed 40 & Over · 8.0

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-05-31Won 10
W#3 DoublesRon Dulay / Jennifer Thessen vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-05-28vs TTC- LauWon 20
W#1 DoublesRon Dulay / Jennifer Thessen vs Naomi Coleman / Shawn Coleman6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesErik Hoenle / Gillian Dionne vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-05-20vs Kiwanis- SummerfieldWon 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Thessen / Eddie White vs Kimberly Dooley / Ruben Diaz6-1, 6-3
2021-05-04vs TTC- LauWon 20
W#1 DoublesRichard Cote / Margaret Staples vs Naomi Coleman / Shawn Coleman6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJennifer Thessen / SURGI STROUD vs Craig McLachlan / Cristi Lau6-0, 6-3
2021-04-10vs Kiwanis- SummerfieldWon 20
W#1 DoublesRichard Cote / Margaret Staples vs Gary Summerfield / Carol Baggett6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJennifer Thessen / Eddie White vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-04-03vs TTC- LauWon 20
W#1 DoublesMargaret Staples / Richard Cote vs Cristi Lau / Greg Lau6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSURGI STROUD / Gillian Dionne vs Britta Barnby / Craig McLachlan6-4, 6-2
2021-03-16vs Kiwanis- SummerfieldWon 20
W#1 DoublesRichard Cote / Margaret Staples vs Carol Baggett / Gary Summerfield6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMarcia Lusk / Ron Dulay vs Ed Anderson / Teresa Blair6-3, 7-5
2021-03-12vs TTC- LauWon 30
W#1 DoublesRichard Cote / Margaret Staples vs Anthony Kalman / Mei Kalman7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMarcia Lusk / Eddie White vs Naomi Coleman / Shawn Coleman6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesSURGI STROUD / Gillian Dionne vs Christopher Barnby / Britta Barnby6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.99
Marcia Lusk
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.94
Eddie White
published 4
3.72
Erik Hoenle
published 4
3.65
Gillian Dionne
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.61
Margaret Staples
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.59
Jennifer Thessen
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.21
Cynthia Simmons
published 3.5
3.13
Ron Dulay
published
Richard Cote
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Marcia Lusk
74W–74L career · 2 lines in 2021
52%48%<1%
3.99
4
Eddie White
9W–2L career · no lines in 2021
<1%66%34%
3.94
4
Erik Hoenle
2W–3L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Gillian Dionne
95W–75L career · 3 lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
3.65
4
Margaret Staples
81W–97L career · 5 lines in 2021
20%80%<1%
3.61
4
Jennifer Thessen
111W–129L career · 7 lines in 2021
24%76%<1%
3.59
3.5
Cynthia Simmons
10W–11L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%1%
3.21
Ron Dulay
6W–11L career · no lines in 2021
16%84%<1%
3.13
Richard Cote
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.