Teams

CVTA BLUE

2025 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · MEN 4.5 - TWILIGHT

6 players · average NTRP 4.62 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-09-17vs NJ REDWon 10
W#2 DoublesConnor Buchanan / Eric Maier vs Thomas DelaFuente / Travis Staebell6-4, 6-3
2025-09-04vs TTA GREENWon 20
W#1 DoublesEric Maier / Matt Miller vs Brian Giesecke / Philip Dixon-Patterson6-0, 7-5
W#2 DoublesConnor Buchanan / Brandon Jacquez vs Anthony Garcia / Ian Harris6-3, 6-3
2025-08-21vs RMTC REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesConnor Buchanan / Matt Miller vs Cedric Scotto / Louis Amundson6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesEric Maier / Brandon Jacquez vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-08-20vs RCC GREENWon 20
W#1 DoublesBrandon Jacquez / Eric Maier vs John Hamill / Ryne Walz6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesConnor Buchanan vs Andrew Hefter6-3, 6-2
2025-08-07vs TTA BLUEWon 20
W#1 DoublesConnor Ohlsen / Peter Fitzgerald vs Zane Freeman / Ryan Pelton6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesConnor Buchanan / Brandon Jacquez vs George Burton / Dylan Griffin6-2, 6-2
2025-07-31vs TTA GREENWon 20
W#1 DoublesCraig Hoeltgen / Connor Ohlsen vs Anthony Garcia / Marcel de Graaf6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesEric Maier / Peter Fitzgerald vs Philip Dixon-Patterson / Ian Harris6-3, 6-3
2025-07-24vs NJ REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesEric Maier / Peter Fitzgerald vs Ryan Dunham / Alexei Uecker6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCraig Hoeltgen / Brandon Jacquez vs Thomas DelaFuente / Albert Eng7-5, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.44 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.51
Eric Maier
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
4.50
Connor Ohlsen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.47
Peter Fitzgerald
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.43
Craig Hoeltgen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.40
Connor Buchanan
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 5
4.33
Brandon Jacquez
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eric Maier + Peter Fitzgerald9072% games+9.3% vs expected
Craig Hoeltgen + Eric Maier6070% games+6.2% vs expected
Connor Ohlsen + Craig Hoeltgen5066% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Eric Maier
33W–0L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
4.51
4.5
Connor Ohlsen
66W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
4.50
Peter Fitzgerald
24W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
4.47
4.5
Craig Hoeltgen
29W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
4.43
5
Connor Buchanan
9W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.40
4.5
Brandon Jacquez
63W–24L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
4.33

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.