Teams

LLAS UPTA65M/Stegall/Brookstone

Mixed 65 & Over · Mixed 3.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-08-25vs LCTA65/Mock/AshboroughEastWon 21
W#1 DoublesRickey Bridges / Deborah B Bowyer vs Frederick Matros / Susan Mock6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesEarl Claypool / Peggy Rutland vs Carol Phipps / Jerry Nomburg6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesDouglas Wright / Patty Orr vs Henry Nelson / Leslie Basner0-6, 1-6
2024-08-24vs LCTA65/Mock/AshboroughEastWon 21
L#1 DoublesRickey Bridges / Patricia Chapman vs Henry Nelson / Susie Fancher6-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesEarl Claypool / Carol Cooper vs Jerry Nomburg / Susan Mock6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDouglas Wright / Patty Orr vs Frederick Matros / Carol Phipps6-4, 7-5
2024-08-24vs LCTA65/Mock/AshboroughEastWon 21
W#1 DoublesRickey Bridges / Deborah B Bowyer vs Henry Nelson / Susie Fancher6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesEarl Claypool / Peggy Rutland vs Frank Caston / Carol Phipps6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJohn Stegall / Therese Woorons vs Leslie Basner / James Simpson1-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Mixed 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LLAS UPTA65M/Stegall/Brookstone3063774
2LCTA65/Mock/AshboroughEast03361394

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Rickey Bridges
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
John Stegall
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Carol Cooper
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Earl Claypool
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.58
Deborah B Bowyer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Patty Orr
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Peggy Rutland
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Shay Jenkins
published
Therese Woorons
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Thomas Diggins
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rickey Bridges
15W–14L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%95%3%
3.26
John Stegall
11W–7L career · 1 line in 2024
1%93%6%
2.79
3
Carol Cooper
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
3
Earl Claypool
7W–7L career · 3 lines in 2024
5%93%1%
2.71
3
Deborah B Bowyer
19W–27L career · 2 lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
2.58
Patty Orr
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Peggy Rutland
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Shay Jenkins
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Therese Woorons
4W–5L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Thomas Diggins
1W–9L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.