Teams

BROWN KL 8.0 Mixed 40+ Mon

2023 Piedmont Mixed 40 & Over · 8.0 Mixed 40+ Mon PM

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-07-17vs DEAN 8.0 Mixed 40+ MonLost 02
L#1 DoublesPeter Cohen / Linda Hall vs Lee Picklesimer / Lisa Baker2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRic Parker / Sallye Parker vs Kimberly Eberhard / Kevin Hawkins6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2023-07-10vs Price 8.0 Mixed 40+ MonWon 10
W#3 DoublesSallye Parker / Peter Cohen vs Graham Summerlee / Kimberly Bell6-2, 6-0
2023-07-01vs Davis 8.0 Mixed 40+ MonLost 01
L#1 DoublesSallye Parker / Peter Cohen vs Marianna Bryce / Christopher Bryce3-6, 2-6
2023-06-27vs Webster 8.0 Mixed 40+ MonWon 10
W#1 DoublesLinda Hall / Peter Cohen vs Steve Webster / Keevie Martin6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2023-06-12vs Robb 8.0 Mixed 40+ MonWon 10
W#2 DoublesBrad McAmis / Linda Hall vs Kevin Smith / Penny Trivette6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2023-06-05vs Albright 8.0 Mixed 40+ MonLost 01
L#1 DoublesJason Altmann / Sallye Parker vs Zachary Tran / Aprille Black2-6, 2-6
2023-05-22vs DEAN 8.0 Mixed 40+ MonSplit 11
W#1 DoublesStephen Davis / Sallye Parker vs Mary Dean / Scott Dean1-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLinda Hall / Peter Cohen vs Carrie Ganim / Tony McGraw5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Mixed 40+ Mon PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
Jason Altmann
published
3.92
Peter Novosad
published
3.86
Peter Cohen
published
3.85
Brad McAmis
published 4
3.69
Pam McAmis
published
3.59
Sallye Parker
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.54
Minerva Loran
published
3.32
Kathy Brown
published
Linda Hall
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Ric Parker
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brad McAmis + Pam McAmis123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jason Altmann
27W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%41%59%
4.03
Peter Novosad
39W–17L career · no lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
3.92
Peter Cohen
16W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
3.86
4
Brad McAmis
10W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%12%
3.85
Pam McAmis
13W–23L career · no lines in 2023
8%92%1%
3.69
Sallye Parker
146W–124L career · 5 lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.59
Minerva Loran
13W–18L career · no lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.54
Kathy Brown
14W–22L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.32
Linda Hall
100W–71L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Ric Parker
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.