Teams

Hankinson 18s 10.0 Mixed Sunday

2026 Piedmont Mixed Doubles 18 · 10.0 Mxd Sun

9 players · average NTRP 4.67 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-26vs Wreder 18s 10.0 Mixed SundayLost 02
L#2 DoublesJamie Breunig / Shepard Moore vs Michael Parker / Kelly Parker0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJohn Hankinson / Megan Kidd vs Asha Iyengar / Philip Kuntz4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-07-19vs Wreder 18s 10.0 Mixed SundaySplit 11
W#2 DoublesPeter Whitehurst / Jamie Breunig vs Asha Iyengar / Marcus Simon6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesShepard Moore / Kate Meiners vs Tiffany Vanhpraseuth / Cameron Smith1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-07-12vs Wreder 18s 10.0 Mixed SundayWon 21
W#1 DoublesJohn Hankinson / Jamie Breunig vs Gabrielle Wreder / Cameron Smith6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDrew Broadstreet / Amanda Arkaev vs Marcus Simon / Asha Iyengar7-5, 7-5
L#3 DoublesPeter Whitehurst / Kate Meiners vs Philip Kuntz / Tiffany Vanhpraseuth4-6, 4-6
2026-07-05vs Wreder 18s 10.0 Mixed SundaySplit 11
L#2 DoublesMegan Kidd / Peter Whitehurst vs Marcus Simon / Asha Iyengar1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesShepard Moore / Kate Meiners vs Conrad Nowogrodzki / Tiffany Vanhpraseuth6-2, 6-4
2026-06-28vs Wreder 18s 10.0 Mixed SundaySplit 11
W#2 DoublesPeter Whitehurst / Kate Meiners vs Conrad Nowogrodzki / Tiffany Vanhpraseuth6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesShepard Moore / Jamie Breunig vs Michael Parker / Kelly Parker6-3, 0-6, 0-1
2026-06-21vs Wreder 18s 10.0 Mixed SundayWon 20
W#1 DoublesDrew Broadstreet / Amanda Arkaev vs Conrad Nowogrodzki / Tiffany Vanhpraseuth6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesPeter Whitehurst / Jamie Breunig vs Marcus Simon / Asha Iyengar4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-06-17vs Wreder 18s 10.0 Mixed SundayLost 02
L#2 DoublesMegan Kidd / Peter Whitehurst vs Marcus Simon / Asha Iyengar2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesShepard Moore / Jamie Breunig vs Michael Parker / Kelly Parker3-6, 4-6
2026-06-07vs Wreder 18s 10.0 Mixed SundayLost 02
L#1 DoublesMegan Kidd / Kyle Scott vs Gabrielle Wreder / Cameron Smith0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Hankinson / Amanda Arkaev vs Michael Parker / Kelly Parker3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 10.0 Mxd Sun
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Wreder 18s 10.0 Mixed Sunday44141024196
2Hankinson 18s 10.0 Mixed Sunday44101430227

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.50 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.69
John Hankinson
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.66
Jamie Breunig
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.64
Shepard Moore
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
4.63
Peter Whitehurst
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
4.48
Kyle Scott
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.38
Annabel Weyand Norman
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.30
Amanda Arkaev
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.26
Kate Meiners
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
Megan Kidd
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shepard Moore + Jamie Breunig033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John Hankinson
35W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
4.69
5
Jamie Breunig
10W–10L career · 6 lines in 2026
10%89%<1%
4.66
Shepard Moore
35W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
15%85%<1%
4.64
Peter Whitehurst
4W–9L career · 6 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
4.63
Kyle Scott
1W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
57%43%<1%
4.48
4.5
Annabel Weyand Norman
29W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
4.38
4.5
Amanda Arkaev
9W–2L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
4.30
Kate Meiners
24W–15L career · 7 lines in 2026
2%95%3%
4.26
Megan Kidd
0W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.