Teams

ST MARY 40AW3.5A

2025 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 3.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Zora Voss
published
3.33
Linda Hofmeister
published
3.25
Susan Rossi
published
3.23
Nicole Leong
published
3.17
Jennifer Hill
published
3.17
Lisa Haskell
published
3.16
Kathy Simon
published
3.14
Rachel Schmidt
published
3.12
Diana Corbin
published 3.5
3.10
Amy Meckfessel
published 3.5
3.04
Priscilla Z Behidj
published
2.78
Sushma Nallapeta
published
2.75
Beth Topor
published 3
2.54
Akanksha Busley
published 3
Faye Isaacson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Rossi + Linda Hofmeister2544% games−3.5% vs expected
Diana Corbin + Rachel Schmidt224 matchesnot enough data
Linda Hofmeister + Rachel Schmidt213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Zora Voss
13W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%13%
3.34
Linda Hofmeister
12W–14L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Susan Rossi
9W–16L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.25
Nicole Leong
8W–14L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Jennifer Hill
12W–16L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Lisa Haskell
6W–16L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.17
Kathy Simon
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16
Rachel Schmidt
4W–7L career · no lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.14
3.5
Diana Corbin
8W–14L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.12
3.5
Amy Meckfessel
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10
Priscilla Z Behidj
35W–30L career · no lines in 2025
<1%38%62%
3.04
Sushma Nallapeta
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
94%6%<1%
2.78
3
Beth Topor
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Akanksha Busley
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
2.54
Faye Isaacson
4W–10L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.