Teams

Klitzke/40's/3.0AW/Mac

2026 Monroe Adult 40 & Over - Women · 3.0 Monroe (40&O) Women

8 players · average NTRP / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-03-25vs Raymond/40's/3.0AW/ForLost 03
L#1 DoublesAmy Taylor / Stacey Majure vs Felicia Hardwick / Sarah Raymond3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesMary Durham vs Andi Holyfield3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJessica Stutts / Erin Klitzke vs Aimee Hayward / Brandee Yarbrough0-6, 0-6
2026-03-21vs Raymond/40's/3.0AW/ForLost 04
L#1 DoublesHope Robertson / Lisa Livigni vs Anna Robinson / Amy Robinson5-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesMelissa Touchet vs Felicia Hardwick2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesErin Klitzke / Jessica Stutts vs Andree Eddleman / Tiffany Turpin2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAmy Taylor / Stacey Majure vs Sarah Raymond / Andi Holyfield1-6, 1-6
2026-03-05vs Raymond/40's/3.0AW/ForLost 04
L#1 DoublesMary Durham / Melissa Touchet vs Brandee Yarbrough / Aimee Hayward2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJennifer Turpin vs Cindy Gibson1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Livigni / Hope Robertson vs Anna Robinson / Amy Robinson4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJessica Stutts / Erin Klitzke vs Andree Eddleman / Tiffany Turpin2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.0 Monroe (40&O) Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Raymond/40's/3.0AW/For30120045
2Klitzke/40's/3.0AW/Mac0301224145

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.51 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.78
Mary Durham
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.44
Erin Klitzke
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.29
Jessica Stutts
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Hope Robertson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Jennifer Turpin
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Lisa Livigni
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Melissa Touchet
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Stacey Majure
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jessica Stutts + Erin Klitzke033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Durham
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
Erin Klitzke
0W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
65%35%<1%
2.44
Jessica Stutts
0W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
93%7%<1%
2.29
Hope Robertson
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jennifer Turpin
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Lisa Livigni
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Melissa Touchet
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Stacey Majure
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.