Teams

Olde Cypress - Navarro

2023 Collier Adult 40 & Over Fall · Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.90 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-12-13vs Marco YMCA - HeiseWon 21
W#1 DoublesKristen Catino / Shelley Boggess vs Bernadette DiPino / Andrea Washak7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLori Coates / Minde Shinnick vs Carrie Masci / Susanna Haedelt0-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLori Caple / Tina Albright vs Stacy Faremouth / Mary Fischer6-0, 4-6, 0-1
2022-12-07vs Pelican Marsh - BargerWon 21
L#1 DoublesKristen Catino / Shelley Boggess vs Karen Steuber / Stephanie Foley1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLori Caple / Beth Rainey vs Marie Shoaf / Nancy Krueger6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCheryl Toth / Tina Albright vs Diana Pleeter / Teresa Madonia7-5, 0-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesShelley Boggess / Minde Shinnick vs MacKenzie Rickman / Mary Miranda-Del Rossi1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAngela Springer / Lori Caple vs Wendy Garber / Nicki Sebold0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCheryl Toth / Anne Mortillaro vs Betsy Moreno Berger / Chrissy Rogers2-6, 3-6
2022-11-15vs Pelican Bay Park - DelkWon 30
W#1 DoublesLori Coates / Minde Shinnick vs Kimberly Davey / Catherine Rigamer6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesTina Albright / Beth Rainey vs Rachael Klaas / Gretchen Landolt3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLori Caple / Angela Springer vs Lisa Gosney / Alexandra Fast6-4, 6-3
2022-11-08vs Naples Reserve - HugginsWon 21
W#1 DoublesMinde Shinnick / Lori Coates vs Samantha Almy / Jan Kolesar6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKristen Catino / Shelley Boggess vs Gina Garfunkel / Susan Julich5-7, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCheryl Toth / Lori Caple vs Maria Blakslee / Ann Heinauer3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2022-11-01vs World Tennis Club - JocWon 21
L#1 DoublesTina Albright / Anne Mortillaro vs Michele Nelson-Baker / Jocelyn Badiu0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesLori Coates / Kristen Catino vs Maureen Wells / Diane Cahill6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLori Caple / Cheryl Toth vs Sindi Sanzica / Shelly-Jo Shuman6-2, 7-6
2022-10-25vs World Tennis Club - LaveryLost 03
L#1 DoublesKristen Catino / Shelley Boggess vs Debra Logue / Teresa Benjamin4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLori Coates / Minde Shinnick vs Jill Frank / Lori Murphy6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTina Albright / Anne Mortillaro vs Lorrie Lavery / Cynthia Streibich1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-10-19vs Quail Creek - K. TumultyWon 30
W#1 DoublesKristen Catino / Shelley Boggess vs Eileen Valerio / Amanda Mallette6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLori Coates / Minde Shinnick vs Karen Hole / Heather Christie6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAngela Springer / Cheryl Toth vs Karen Tumulty / Noelle Penfield6-2, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Minde Shinnick
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.74
Rae Fairfield
published 4
3.74
Kristen Catino
published
3.67
Lori Caple
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.66
Angela Springer
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.59
Shelley Boggess
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.43
Beth Rainey
published 3.5
3.42
Anne Mortillaro
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.36
Susanne Navarro
published
3.33
Tina Albright
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Lori Coates
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Minde Shinnick + Lori Coates312552% games+0.2% vs expected
Angela Springer + Lori Coates543854% games−1.3% vs expected
Lori Coates + Susanne Navarro13851% gamesnot enough data
Shelley Boggess + Susanne Navarro7548% gamesnot enough data
Angela Springer + Lori Caple2846% gamesnot enough data
Angela Springer + Susanne Navarro5454% gamesnot enough data
Susanne Navarro + Lori Caple5350% gamesnot enough data
Minde Shinnick + Shelley Boggess1638% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Minde Shinnick
119W–115L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%90%8%
3.81
4
Rae Fairfield
51W–25L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.74
Kristen Catino
23W–21L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.74
4
Lori Caple
130W–93L career · 6 lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.67
4
Angela Springer
88W–87L career · 3 lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.66
Shelley Boggess
191W–176L career · 6 lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.59
3.5
Beth Rainey
14W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
3.43
4
Anne Mortillaro
36W–66L career · 3 lines in 2023
70%30%<1%
3.42
Susanne Navarro
229W–208L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
3.36
Tina Albright
17W–40L career · 5 lines in 2023
89%11%<1%
3.33
Lori Coates
202W–160L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.