Teams

Lifetime - Haladwala/Gilchrist

2026 B'ham Tri-Level Weeknight - 18 & Over M · W

15 players · average NTRP 3.80 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-08vs BH - GastonLost 02
L#2 DoublesMichael Bennett / Jacob Gallagher vs Keith Andress / Hayden Gunter3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesTommy Cox / David Cox vs Adam Pennebaker / Tripp Salem3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-06-30vs BH - GastonLost 02
L#2 DoublesBrandon Chanco / David Cox vs Benjamin Barrow / Hayden Gunter0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMichael Bennett / Paul Vercher vs Patrick Taylor / Adam Pennebaker5-7, 5-7
2026-06-25vs YMCA Mt. Brook - FrederickLost 01
L#3 DoublesPaul Vercher / Allen Porter vs Charles Carter / Gatewood Thrasher3-6, 2-6
2026-06-11vs YMCA Mt. Brook - FrederickLost 03
L#1 DoublesWilliam Mustian / Prabhdeep Singh vs Beebe Frederick / Mason Lake7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBrian Harbison / Sam Wasko vs KYLE SAIN / Joe Smith1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMichael Bennett / Paul Vercher vs Charles Carter / Gatewood Thrasher3-6, 5-7
2026-05-28vs BH - GastonLost 12
W#1 DoublesWilliam Mustian / Prabhdeep Singh vs Keith Andress / John Andress6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAllen Porter / Joshua Coger vs Patrick Taylor / Benjamin Barrow1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJay Gilchrist / Brian Harbison vs Mac Chambers / Tripp Salem1-6, 1-6
2026-05-21vs YMCA Mt. Brook - FrederickLost 03
L#1 DoublesDakota Harris / Jacob McAllister vs Thom Houston / Damon Cox4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBrandon Chanco / Jacob Gallagher vs Joe Smith / KYLE SAIN1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesTommy Cox / David Cox vs Gatewood Thrasher / Jonathan Arnold5-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BH - Gaston5114410119
2Lifetime - Haladwala/Gilchrist0611734215

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.09
Dakota Harris
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.87
William Mustian
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.79
Jacob McAllister
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.77
Prabhdeep Singh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.70
Jeff Stephenson
published
3.61
Joshua Coger
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.53
Brandon Chanco
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.43
Tommy Cox
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Allen Porter
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.38
Jay Gilchrist
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
David Cox
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.15
Brian Harbison
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.00
Paul Vercher
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.93
Mark Haladwala
published
Jacob Gallagher
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tommy Cox + David Cox9654% games−0.4% vs expected
Prabhdeep Singh + William Mustian2446% gamesnot enough data
Brandon Chanco + Joshua Coger033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Dakota Harris
9W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
26%74%<1%
4.09
William Mustian
5W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
83%17%<1%
3.87
Jacob McAllister
5W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
93%7%<1%
3.79
Prabhdeep Singh
41W–53L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.77
Jeff Stephenson
2W–10L career · no lines in 2026
98%2%<1%
3.70
Joshua Coger
8W–19L career · 5 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.61
4
Brandon Chanco
25W–22L career · 7 lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
3.53
Tommy Cox
34W–29L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.43
3.5
Allen Porter
25W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.42
Jay Gilchrist
22W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
David Cox
9W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%89%9%
3.32
3.5
Brian Harbison
23W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
15%85%1%
3.15
Paul Vercher
23W–30L career · 3 lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
3.00
Mark Haladwala
34W–35L career · no lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.93
Jacob Gallagher
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.