Teams

IE-CL-Kurt Mascio/Khuong (Darren) Le

2023 USTA Adult 18 & Over - IE · IE Men 4.5

10 players · average NTRP 4.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
L#1 DoublesScott Carr / Richard Layon vs Maki Potes / ISMAEL RODRIGUEZ6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesEVAN CHANG / Martin Jay Rodiles vs Guage Krask / Brett Stacy1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesScott Carr / EVAN CHANG vs Chris Pena / Willie Yeh6-3, 6-3
2023-06-18Split 11
L#2 DoublesKhang Le / Richard Layon vs Miko Potes / Brett Stacy0-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesEVAN CHANG vs Dat Le6-4, 6-3
L#1 DoublesEVAN CHANG / Richard Layon vs Miko Potes / Nicolas Stansbury2-6, 0-2
L#2 DoublesEVAN CHANG / Khang Le vs Adrian Belcher / Maki Potes3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for IE Men 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.13 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.23
Richard Layon
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.22
Khang Le
published
4.21
Michael Masarani
published
4.19
Khuong Le
published
4.12
Scott Carr
published
4.11
Ben Lopez
published 4.5
4.02
Martin Jay Rodiles
published
3.94
EVAN CHANG
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 4.5
Jacob Lui
published
John Benner
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Khuong Le + Khang Le1644% games−5.7% vs expected
Richard Layon + EVAN CHANG2343% gamesnot enough data
Scott Carr + Ben Lopez224 matchesnot enough data
Scott Carr + Khuong Le123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Richard Layon
61W–45L career · 3 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
4.23
Khang Le
11W–10L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
4.22
Michael Masarani
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
4.21
Khuong Le
12W–18L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
4.19
Scott Carr
10W–9L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
4.12
4.5
Ben Lopez
4W–11L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
4.11
Martin Jay Rodiles
5W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%45%55%
4.02
4.5
EVAN CHANG
97W–139L career · 5 lines in 2023
67%33%<1%
3.94
Jacob Lui
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
John Benner
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.