Teams

MVC Lee SSL A18-4.0W

2025 WMI SSL USTA League Adult 18&Over Weekday Leagues · WMI SSL A18&O 4.0 W (8 player)

15 players · average NTRP 4.00 / WESTERN MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-05-30vs WH Lowes SSL A18-4.0WWon 10
W#1 DoublesKerry Clay / Natalie Pickup vs Mauri VanDenBerg / Jalynn Schnr6-3, 6-2
2025-05-16vs MVS Klingenberg SSL A18-4.0WWon 10
W#1 DoublesNatalie Pickup / Irina Leyfman vs Rose Waypa / Maggie Stewart6-0, 6-4
2025-05-02vs PTC Mast SSL A18-4.0WWon 50
W#1 DoublesNatalie Pickup / Teresa Nelson vs Sherri Lawrence / Christina Sanchez-Martin6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJulie Ludden vs Hillary Kosik6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesEmi Mueller / Meera Lee vs Joan Hannadarrell / Brittnee Tomlin6-3, 7-5
W#2 SinglesKristen Snyder vs Nancy Brower6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKerry Clay / Stacy Ehrlich vs Mary Muller / Elizabeth Patrick7-5, 6-1
2025-04-04vs HC Irish SSL A18-4.0WWon 10
W#1 DoublesNatalie Pickup / Kerry Clay vs Rachel Haan / Mindy Koschmann7-5, 6-7, 1-0
2025-03-21vs MVH Davis SSL A18-4.0WWon 10
W#1 DoublesIrina Leyfman / Natalie Pickup vs Tanya Gonzalez / Emily Van Faasen6-1, 6-0
2025-03-07vs MY Harris SSL A18-4.0WWon 41
W#1 DoublesAmy McKenzie / Meera Lee vs Diana Schimpf / Ronda Stafford6-0, 6-3
W#1 SinglesTeresa Nelson vs Amber Sample6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesNatalie Pickup / Sarah Williams vs Carol Heinicke / Sarah Abramson6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesMichelle Krick vs Carmen Harris7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesStacy Ehrlich / Courtney Muth vs Lauren Worgess / Anne Rajkovich6-1, 6-7, 0-1
2025-02-07vs MVC Wassenaar SSL A18-4.0WWon 41
W#1 DoublesAmy McKenzie / Kerry Clay vs Wanlapawadee Orellana / Sarah Armbruster2-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMichelle Krick vs Jen Kushak3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesCourtney Muth / Stacy Ehrlich vs Dawn Wolownik / Natsuko Tsutsumi Buckhold6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesKristen Snyder vs Rachel Ogilvie6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSabina Centner / Sarah Williams vs Tara Herrington / Kate Vincent6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WMI SSL A18&O 4.0 W (8 player) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Natalie Pickup
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.98
Emi Mueller
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.93
Julie Ludden
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.90
Yexin Li
published
3.84
Teresa Nelson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.79
Kerry Clay
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.77
Stacy Ehrlich
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.75
Marie Shea
published
3.74
Courtney Muth
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.72
Kristen Snyder
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.72
Irina Leyfman
published
3.71
Meera Lee
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.62
Amy McKenzie
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.61
Sabina Centner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.57
Michelle Krick
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Natalie Pickup + Teresa Nelson6076% games+10.6% vs expected
Kristen Snyder + Teresa Nelson6257% games+10.2% vs expected
Emi Mueller + Julie Ludden10076% games+8.9% vs expected
Stacy Ehrlich + Meera Lee9268% games+8.3% vs expected
Natalie Pickup + Courtney Muth4169% games+6.8% vs expected
Kristen Snyder + Michelle Krick4549% games+4.7% vs expected
Kerry Clay + Meera Lee26562% games+2.8% vs expected
Stacy Ehrlich + Amy McKenzie7165% games+2.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Natalie Pickup
133W–55L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
4.05
Emi Mueller
82W–39L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%56%44%
3.98
Julie Ludden
135W–39L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.93
Yexin Li
29W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.90
Teresa Nelson
70W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.84
Kerry Clay
88W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
Stacy Ehrlich
122W–24L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
Marie Shea
77W–27L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Courtney Muth
33W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.74
Kristen Snyder
64W–37L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.72
Irina Leyfman
37W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%6%94%
3.72
4
Meera Lee
111W–34L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.71
4
Amy McKenzie
75W–49L career · 2 lines in 2025
20%79%<1%
3.62
Sabina Centner
33W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
21%78%<1%
3.61
Michelle Krick
50W–49L career · 2 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.57

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.