Teams

CC MBHS Hostetter

2026 USTA CC Summer Adult 65 & OVER · CC USTA 65 & OVER 7.0W

14 players · average NTRP 3.42 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-09-01vs CC Trilogy RobeckLost 12
L#1 DoublesAnn Paredes / Edith Martin vs Gail Edry / Trish Ross7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAmy Stets / Annette Adamski vs Myrdith King / Heather Harper6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDeborah Beatty / Morri Nash vs Janet Holland / Hilda Fischer3-6, 4-6
2026-08-30vs CC Trilogy RobeckWon 21
W#1 DoublesEdith Martin / Cherie Charbonneau vs Christine Sweeney / Gail Edry6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesRoberta Fischer / Ann Paredes vs Trish Ross / Melanie Sundstrom6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAmy Stets / Leslie Kaplan vs Heather Harper / Kathleen Aldridge5-7, 6-1, 0-1
2026-08-09vs CC Trilogy RobeckWon 30
W#1 DoublesJoan Jordan / Edith Martin vs Gail Edry / Christine Sweeney6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRoberta Fischer / Melanie Topp vs Melanie Sundstrom / Donna Tracy6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDeborah Beatty / Teresa Schmutte vs Hilda Fischer / Myrdith King6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CC USTA 65 & OVER 7.0W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Roberta Fischer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Edith Martin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Ann Paredes
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.21
Annette Adamski
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Amy Stets
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.13
Joan Jordan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Deborah Beatty
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
Teresa Schmutte
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Pamela Hostetter
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.94
Morri Nash
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.91
Leslie Kaplan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.88
Cherie Charbonneau
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Karen Meertens
published
Melanie Topp
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Roberta Fischer + Ann Paredes8163% games−3.1% vs expected
Deborah Beatty + Morri Nash1437% games−3.7% vs expected
Karen Meertens + Deborah Beatty3448% gamesnot enough data
Pamela Hostetter + Morri Nash5158% gamesnot enough data
Ann Paredes + Amy Stets3256% gamesnot enough data
Teresa Schmutte + Deborah Beatty314 matchesnot enough data
Roberta Fischer + Edith Martin314 matchesnot enough data
Deborah Beatty + Amy Stets303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Roberta Fischer
15W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Edith Martin
17W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.31
3.5
Ann Paredes
19W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%92%8%
3.31
3.5
Annette Adamski
3W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Amy Stets
16W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
Joan Jordan
5W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Deborah Beatty
11W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.10
Teresa Schmutte
15W–25L career · 1 line in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.07
Pamela Hostetter
15W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.02
Morri Nash
26W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.94
Leslie Kaplan
18W–26L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
2.91
3
Cherie Charbonneau
12W–25L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
2.88
Karen Meertens
11W–8L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Melanie Topp
6W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.