Teams

JMontague-ENO

2025 Eno River Singles 18 & Over · 18 & Over Singles 4.0 Men Evening

8 players · average NTRP 3.83 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-06-30vs JByrd-ENOWon 10
W#2 SinglesBarry Gooch vs Edward Anderson6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2025-06-27vs APineda-CHTCSplit 11
L#1 SinglesBarry Gooch vs Will Lassiter3-6, 5-7
W#3 SinglesConor Kregecz vs Richard Henderson6-2, 6-4
2025-06-23vs DVyas-ENOSplit 11
L#2 SinglesBarry Gooch vs Josh Jones4-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesConor Kregecz vs Dipen Vyas6-0, 6-1
2025-06-09vs JByrd-ENOLost 01
L#2 SinglesBarry Gooch vs Alex Boggis3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-06-02vs DVyas-ENOWon 20
W#2 SinglesRick Leib vs Michael Pournaras6-2, 6-1
W#3 SinglesTevin Wilson vs Jonathan Surrency6-0, 6-2
2025-05-20vs AHanda-CHTCLost 02
L#1 SinglesTevin Wilson vs Alexis Maklakoff5-7, 3-6
L#2 SinglesBarry Gooch vs Reed Breneman1-6, 3-6
2025-05-19vs SBible-ENOLost 02
L#1 SinglesRick Leib vs Stewart Bible1-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesBarry Gooch vs Michael Weslander5-7, 4-6
2025-05-05vs APineda-CHTCWon 10
W#2 SinglesRick Leib vs Kiran Ramaswamy6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Singles 4.0 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Tevin Wilson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 4
3.75
Barry Gooch
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 17% · published 4
David Schumann
published 4
3.67
Rick Leib
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.64
Josh MacIver
published
3.62
Mark Petersen
published
3.58
Conor Kregecz
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.34
JAMES MONTAGUE
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rick Leib + Conor Kregecz213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Tevin Wilson
131W–78L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.93
4
Barry Gooch
112W–110L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%95%3%
3.75
4
David Schumann
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Rick Leib
32W–26L career · 3 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.67
Josh MacIver
4W–12L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
3.64
Mark Petersen
8W–3L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.62
3.5
Conor Kregecz
69W–28L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
3.58
3.5
JAMES MONTAGUE
29W–43L career · no lines in 2025
<1%89%11%
3.34

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.