← Teams

N OR-WHRC-Cronk

2023 Adult 55 & Over · 9.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 4.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 4.03 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.19
Cathrine Olander
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.17
Yuko Hopman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.13
Sarah Morris
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.11
Sue Gregoire
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.04
Michelle Donato
usually #1 Doubles 79%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4.5
3.94
Chiho Cronk
usually #1 Doubles 59%, also #3 Doubles 24% · published 4.5
3.85
Rebecca Redding
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
3.85
Deanna Lautenbach
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
Results10 ties
2022-11-20Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesChiho Cronk / Sue Gregoire vs Jackie Dooris / Takumi Koyama6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSarah Morris / Rebecca Redding vs Julie Hanson / Donna Kennish6-0, 6-1
2022-11-13Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesChiho Cronk / Michelle Donato vs Shannon Dilorenzo / Mariniah Prendergast6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSue Gregoire / Deanna Lautenbach vs Lori Layne / Cynthia McPhee6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesSarah Morris / Rebecca Redding vs Jennifer Devoe / Lisa Handley4-6, 4-2
2022-10-30Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesMichelle Donato / Deanna Lautenbach vs Deborah Borchers / Yumiko Pike6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSarah Morris / Rebecca Redding vs Tami Oglesby / Lisa Provost6-0, 6-4
2022-10-29Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesSue Gregoire / Deanna Lautenbach vs Monika Dolega-kowalewski / Marie Picard6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChiho Cronk / Michelle Donato vs Shannon Fraser / Sandy Garry6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesYuko Hopman / Cathrine Olander vs Rhonda Thomas / June Wu6-3, 7-5
2022-10-23Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesMichelle Donato / Chiho Cronk vs Kathleen Goyette / Maureen Strieb6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2022-10-22Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesMichelle Donato / Chiho Cronk vs Pamela Alexander / Jo Ann Kurz6-0, 6-2
2022-10-22Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesMichelle Donato / Chiho Cronk vs Pamela Alexander / Jo Ann Kurz6-3, 6-2
2022-10-14Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesChiho Cronk / Michelle Donato vs Lisa Gray / Linda Anderson6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesSue Gregoire / Deanna Lautenbach vs Kim Hill / Carol Woolman6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesYuko Hopman / Sarah Morris vs Anne McCroskey / Launi Smith6-1, 6-4
2022-10-08Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesMichelle Donato / Sue Gregoire vs Lisa Lyon / Cathy Porter6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesChiho Cronk / Rebecca Redding vs Angie Lee / Margaret Sivertsen6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesYuko Hopman / Sarah Morris vs Julie Hanson / Deanna Peterson6-0, 6-0
2022-09-24Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesMichelle Donato / Cathrine Olander vs Becky Rey / Gale Volk6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSue Gregoire / Deanna Lautenbach vs Deborah Borchers / Yumiko Pike4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChiho Cronk / Rebecca Redding vs Jill Sather / Cindy Rushall6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Cathrine Olander
80W–65L career
2%97%1%
4.19
4.5
Yuko Hopman
116W–79L career
1%99%0%
4.17
4.5
Sarah Morris
85W–38L career
3%97%0%
4.13
4.5
Sue Gregoire
120W–80L career
3%97%0%
4.11
4.5
Michelle Donato
106W–70L career
9%91%0%
4.04
4.5
Chiho Cronk
92W–68L career
30%70%0%
3.94
4.5
Rebecca Redding
97W–95L career
54%46%0%
3.85
4.5
Deanna Lautenbach
55W–83L career
55%45%0%
3.85

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.