← Teams

CGM-Borchers/Rey

2022 Adult 55 & Over · 9.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.93 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Jill Sather
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.76
Yumiko Pike
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.71
Nenette Olson
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.47
Becky Rey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.46
Deborah Borchers
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.40
Cindy Rushall
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.09
Lisa Provost
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
—
Gale Volk
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 0
Results8 ties
2021-11-13Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesDeborah Borchers / Jill Sather vs Karen Sullivan / Launi Smith7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesYumiko Pike / Gale Volk vs Linda Graham / Karen Mathews7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLisa Provost / Cindy Rushall vs Kim Hill / Bonnie Sidoff6-2, 6-2
2021-11-07Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesTami Oglesby / Jill Sather vs Pam Edinger / Sue Gregoire6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLisa Provost / Nenette Olson vs Julie Bryan Maack / June Wu6-3, 6-2
2021-10-31Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesGale Volk / Yumiko Pike vs Amy Leahy / Stacy Hawkins Parker6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesDeborah Borchers / Tami Oglesby vs Trina Denson / Shannon Dilorenzo6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesCindy Rushall / Lisa Provost vs Lori Layne / Mary Jo Kallgren6-1, 6-0
2021-10-23Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesDeborah Borchers / Jill Sather vs Chiho Cronk / Rebecca Redding6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTami Oglesby / Yumiko Pike vs Julie Brown / Claire Thayer6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLisa Provost / Cindy Rushall vs Kelly Branson / Marie Picard4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-10-23Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesBecky Rey / Jill Sather vs Sandy Garry / June Wu6-0, 7-5
L#2 DoublesYumiko Pike / Tami Oglesby vs Pam Edinger / Liz ODonnell6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDeborah Borchers / Nenette Olson vs Janet Tabor / Sue Gregoire1-6, 7-6, 1-0
2021-10-16Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesDeborah Borchers / Yumiko Pike vs Janine Paulson / Xia Wu3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBecky Rey / Jill Sather vs Karen Sullivan / Anne McCroskey6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNenette Olson / Cindy Rushall vs Kori Montpas / Linda Anderson6-1, 6-2
2021-09-25Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesYumiko Pike / Gale Volk vs Kimberly Quach / Chiho Cronk6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDeborah Borchers / Jill Sather vs Kelly Branson / Marie Picard2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesGinny Nichols / Cindy Rushall vs Rebecca Redding / Kay Dobashi6-0, 6-3
2021-09-18Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesJill Sather / Gale Volk vs Elise Orban / Amy Leahy6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDeborah Borchers / Yumiko Pike vs Lori Layne / Stacy Hawkins Parker6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesCindy Rushall / Lisa Provost vs Mary Kurz / Jennifer Devoe6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Jill Sather
45W–75L career
1%99%0%
3.76
4
Yumiko Pike
73W–97L career
1%99%0%
3.76
4
Nenette Olson
122W–164L career
2%98%0%
3.71
4
Becky Rey
26W–49L career
43%57%0%
3.47
4
Deborah Borchers
53W–101L career
46%54%0%
3.46
4
Cindy Rushall
100W–170L career
64%36%0%
3.40
3.5
Lisa Provost
37W–120L career
19%81%0%
3.09
0
Gale Volk
15W–21L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.