Teams

JGardiner (OPRC)

2026 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Combo 8.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 4.29 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-09-01vs WParker (Queens)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesEryn Ratcliffe / Suzy Johnson vs Allyson McKay / Angela Stallman1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCarolyn Drake / Susan Jaffe vs Maggie Connolly / Heather Crysler5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTylee Kessler / Caroline Pickup vs Cassandra Wincek / Sabrina Gregory0-6, 3-6
2026-08-25vs JBlack (Queens)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesEryn Ratcliffe / Susan Jaffe vs Madison Lohnes / Chelse Stevens1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesCaroline Pickup / Jennifer Gardiner vs Christina McWilliams / Amanda Patrocino4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBrooke Grindle / Tylee Kessler vs Lauren Mulcahy / Kimberly Diaz3-6, 2-6
2026-08-23vs KCrosby/KMartin (Sardis)Won 21
W#1 DoublesEryn Ratcliffe / Suzy Johnson vs Katie Kelleher / Sophie Pollak4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesStuart Pfeifer / Tylee Kessler vs Sophie Lanham / Kathryn Martin6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesCarolyn Drake / Caroline Pickup vs Madeline Jurch / Julia Knight2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2026-08-18vs CKahm/ASherrill (Queens)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesKim Cochran / Susan Jaffe vs Lina Clarke / Lane Merlo5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Margulis / Kristin Davin vs Cynthia Brinneman / Anna Gay5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJennifer Gardiner / Caroline Pickup vs Holly Natwick / Jessica Varn6-4, 6-3
2026-08-15vs DWest (Queens)Won 30
W#1 DoublesCaroline Pickup / Eryn Ratcliffe vs Dora Burdzinska-Drezek / Irma Laney7-5, 7-5
W#2 DoublesSusan Jaffe / Kim Cochran vs Hoa Tran / Maria Emilia de la Orden7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJennifer Margulis / Kristin Davin vs Lorna Doucette / Meredith Sweeney7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings13 teams · 18 & Over Combo 8.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TBasinger (CSRC)2060129
2FOno/TGreen (Chestnut Square Park)2051332
3JBlack (Queens)2051452
4CKahm/ASherrill (Queens)2042550
5MMiller (Queens)1021222
6DConrad/SSmulktis (Park Road)1021223
7WParker (Queens)1142445
8JGardiner (OPRC)1142564
9AAugustine/Titlestad (OPRC)1133751
10WJourdan (PPRSC)1124960
11HPhelps (Bridgehampton)0224954
12KCrosby/KMartin (Sardis)02151065
13AStein (Ballantyne CC)02151172

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.07 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.43
Tylee Kessler
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.25
Kristin Davin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.24
Eryn Ratcliffe
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.24
Kim Cochran
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.21
Carolyn Drake
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.18
Jennifer Gardiner
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.10
Caroline Pickup
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.96
Suzy Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.92
Susan Jaffe
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.84
Brooke Grindle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.79
Jennifer Margulis
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.63
Stuart Pfeifer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stuart Pfeifer + Caroline Pickup4252% games−2.4% vs expected
Jennifer Gardiner + Kristin Davin2355% games−2.5% vs expected
Tylee Kessler + Stuart Pfeifer3451% games−3.3% vs expected
Jennifer Gardiner + Carolyn Drake2344% gamesnot enough data
Carolyn Drake + Caroline Pickup2350% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Gardiner + Caroline Pickup314 matchesnot enough data
Suzy Johnson + Eryn Ratcliffe314 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Gardiner + Tylee Kessler213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Tylee Kessler
128W–43L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
4.43
4.5
Kristin Davin
72W–26L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Eryn Ratcliffe
22W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
4.24
Kim Cochran
27W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
4.24
4.5
Carolyn Drake
24W–28L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
4.21
Jennifer Gardiner
38W–32L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
4.18
4
Caroline Pickup
247W–114L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%22%78%
4.10
Suzy Johnson
55W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
3.96
Susan Jaffe
27W–32L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.92
4
Brooke Grindle
46W–31L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%89%11%
3.84
4
Jennifer Margulis
79W–42L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.79
Stuart Pfeifer
17W–19L career · 1 line in 2026
15%85%<1%
3.63

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.