Teams

CCC GREEN

2025 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · MEN 4.5 - TWILIGHT

6 players · average NTRP 4.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-09-09vs PRKR ORANGEWon 20
W#1 DoublesAndrew Banks / Michael Slutzky vs Greg Connelly / Ankit Koul6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesTravis Beard / Daniel Smith vs Firmin GorraDiallo / Jeff Aberle6-3, 6-2
2025-09-04vs LEBTC NAVYSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCody Mckay / Michael Slutzky vs Andy Newton / Hernan Mendez6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesTravis Beard / Daniel Smith vs Ben Williamson / Dan Shea6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-08-14vs SS-H NAVYWon 20
W#1 DoublesCody Mckay / Michael Slutzky vs Josh Dougan / Andy Duncan2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAndy Zodin / Jack Barker vs Matthew Bruff / Rob Mullins6-3, 6-1
2025-08-07vs GAC GREENSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAndrew Banks / Michael Slutzky vs Chris Cremer / Ryan Beckstrom6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTravis Beard / Matt Culig vs Jacob Toffler / Trenton Steese6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-07-31vs SS-LT REDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCody Mckay / Michael Slutzky vs William Epping / Chip Hudson6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesTravis Beard / Steven Ziegler vs Brad Shores / Nick Taylor3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-07-24vs HRCA-N BLUESplit 11
W#1 DoublesAndrew Banks / Michael Slutzky vs Christopher Wiksten / Steve Zubowicz6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesCody Mckay / Lou Pendleton vs Brian Swift / Thomas Larsen6-1, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · MEN 4.5 - TWILIGHT
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CCC GREEN601441089
2WP BLACK5214717165
3SS-H NAVY4211717152
4CP SILVER4312923188
5ATC BLACK2571430213
6RMTC RED2551632223

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.35 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.49
Michael Slutzky
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.48
Andrew Banks
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.38
Cody Mckay
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
Andy Zodin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.04
Travis Beard
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Steven Ziegler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Slutzky + Cody Mckay6070% games+11.0% vs expected
Michael Slutzky + Andrew Banks303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Slutzky
11W–1L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
4.49
4.5
Andrew Banks
24W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
4.48
4.5
Cody Mckay
6W–1L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
4.38
4.5
Andy Zodin
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Travis Beard
15W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
4.04
Steven Ziegler
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.