Teams

AFields (Pine Lake CC)

2025 Combo Doubles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over 5.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-10-13vs KSmith (Piper Glen)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesHolly Sawyer / Jessica Hargis vs Jennifer Lang / Ursula Bonar6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2025-09-15vs LShelton (BCC)Won 10
W#2 DoublesAnne Fields / Jessica Hargis vs Rebecca Maietta / Natalie Corrigan6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2025-09-08vs TEby (OPRC)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJessica Hargis / Juanita Kylander vs Tiffany Eby / Surabhi Chopra7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2025-09-01vs ASpanjers (Park Road)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJessica Hargis / Sarah Miller vs Meredith Heimburger / Annie Spanjers0-6, 0-6
2025-08-25vs PSweeney (FCC)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesSara Cannon / Jessica Hargis vs Kim King / Brooke Winkelman2-6, 5-7
2025-08-18vs BTobia (Brookhaven)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJessica Hargis / Sara Cannon vs Erin Pacilli / Hollis Marek3-6, 1-6
2025-08-11vs BHerman (PCC)Won 10
W#1 DoublesJessica Hargis / Anne Fields vs Sally Connor / Brooks Herman6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.15 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.40
Karen Holbrook
published
2.36
Kelly Steele
published
2.13
Jessica Hargis
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 2.5
2.12
Juanita Kylander
published
1.94
Erin Boulet
published
1.93
Robin Niedermeier
published
Kate Mcdonald
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karen Holbrook
1W–7L career · no lines in 2025
75%25%<1%
2.40
Kelly Steele
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
85%15%<1%
2.36
2.5
Jessica Hargis
11W–26L career · 7 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Juanita Kylander
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Erin Boulet
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.94
Robin Niedermeier
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
1.93
Kate Mcdonald
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.