Teams

DC Rally Champs

2025 Washington D.C. Adult 18 & Over · Washington D.C. Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / WASHINGTON D.C.

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-06-07vs DC Tennis ClubLost 13
L#1 DoublesWill Fischer / Elias Ghorayeb vs Mitchell Miller / Eric Paisner1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesPablo Gardea vs Charles Davant2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesYashasvi Baweja / Erick Herrera vs Elliot Mamet / Jake Cumsky-Whitlock6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesRalph Bell / Chris Matlock vs Charles Hutchison / William Bryan4-6, 3-4
2025-05-11vs Beez II MenSplit 22
L#1 DoublesElias Ghorayeb / Will Fischer vs Evan Neuwirth / Eric Zeldis3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#1 SinglesChris Matlock vs Patrick Keating6-3, 2-2
W#2 DoublesErick Herrera / Yashasvi Baweja vs Peter Sullivan / Jeremy Levinson6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPablo Gardea / Peter Trahan vs William Monahan / Jefferson Gasteier6-7, 3-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Washington D.C. Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.23
Will Fischer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Peter Trahan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Jack Turman
published
3.04
Elias Ghorayeb
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Atef Dahshan
published 3
2.76
Pablo Gardea
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Chris Matlock
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Erick Herrera
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Ralph Bell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Yashasvi Baweja
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pablo Gardea + Peter Trahan3257% gamesnot enough data
Will Fischer + Atef Dahshan314 matchesnot enough data
Chris Matlock + Atef Dahshan213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Will Fischer
17W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Peter Trahan
13W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.12
Jack Turman
10W–6L career · no lines in 2025
26%73%<1%
3.09
Elias Ghorayeb
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.04
3
Atef Dahshan
15W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.90
Pablo Gardea
6W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
96%4%<1%
2.76
3
Chris Matlock
15W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Erick Herrera
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ralph Bell
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Yashasvi Baweja
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.