Teams

LCTA65/Bowers-Wehunt/Maybank

USTA - 65 & Over · 65 & over Women 4.0

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-06-17vs LCTA65/Claussen/LTP-DIWon 21
L#1 DoublesJane Brennan / Diana Shirley vs Genevieve McCutcheon / Susie Peiffer2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMargaret Hamilton / Emily Singer vs Doris Glaz / Catherine South6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesBeth Mandell / Kitsy Wise vs Barbara Pinkerton / Charlotte Gerber4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-06-03vs LCTA65/Williamson/MPRWon 21
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Holt / Jan Smith vs Caroline Bailey / Ann OBrien6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesMargaret Hamilton / Joann Purdy vs Becky Montgomery / Susan Carpenter7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesAlexandra Mears / Emily Singer vs Debra Mulholland / Julie Raney5-7, 3-6
2026-05-27vs LCTA65/Claussen/LTP-DILost 12
W#1 DoublesDiana Shirley / Jane Brennan vs Genevieve McCutcheon / Charlotte Gerber6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLaury Wehunt / Beth Mandell vs Susie Peiffer / Lori Claussen4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Holt / Jan Smith vs Doris Glaz / Anita Greene7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2026-05-13vs LCTA65/Williamson/MPRLost 12
W#1 DoublesDiana Shirley / Jane Brennan vs Kim Teague / Debra Mulholland6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKitsy Wise / Melody Sliker vs Rebecca Williamson / Caroline Bailey4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLaura Bowers / Jan Smith vs Madge Dennis / Susan Carpenter4-6, 3-6
2026-05-06vs LCTA65/Claussen/LTP-DILost 12
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Holt / Laury Wehunt vs Genevieve McCutcheon / Susie Peiffer2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMargaret Hamilton / Joann Purdy vs Anita Greene / Lori Claussen4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesDiana Shirley / Jane Brennan vs Amy Kelly / Charlotte Gerber6-4, 6-2
2026-04-22vs LCTA65/Williamson/MPRWon 21
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Holt / Jan Smith vs Janine Dalva / Becky Montgomery2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAlexandra Mears / Emily Singer vs Julie Raney / Debra Mulholland3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJane Brennan / Diana Shirley vs Rebecca Williamson / Ann OBrien6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 65 & over Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Diana Shirley
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.70
Alexandra Mears
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.69
Beth Mandell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.66
Joann Purdy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Laury Wehunt
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.57
Jane Brennan
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.56
Kitsy Wise
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.56
Elizabeth Holt
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.44
Emily Singer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.36
Melody Sliker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Meredith McArdle
published
3.19
Laura Bowers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Margaret Hamilton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Bowers + Melody Sliker71043% games−2.4% vs expected
Kitsy Wise + Melody Sliker4444% games−2.7% vs expected
Jane Brennan + Diana Shirley6848% games−3.6% vs expected
Jane Brennan + Margaret Hamilton134 matchesnot enough data
Diana Shirley + Joann Purdy134 matchesnot enough data
Diana Shirley + Melody Sliker224 matchesnot enough data
Alexandra Mears + Emily Singer033 matchesnot enough data
Diana Shirley + Margaret Hamilton303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Diana Shirley
84W–51L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%79%20%
3.88
4
Alexandra Mears
47W–49L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.70
4
Beth Mandell
19W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
Joann Purdy
27W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
13%87%1%
3.66
Laury Wehunt
66W–47L career · 2 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.58
Jane Brennan
15W–26L career · 5 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.57
Kitsy Wise
8W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.56
Elizabeth Holt
34W–50L career · 4 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.56
Emily Singer
11W–36L career · 3 lines in 2026
68%32%<1%
3.44
Melody Sliker
21W–37L career · 1 line in 2026
84%16%<1%
3.36
Meredith McArdle
33W–59L career · no lines in 2026
87%13%<1%
3.34
Laura Bowers
36W–40L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.19
Margaret Hamilton
14W–15L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.