Teams

Naples Reserve -L. Keely

2024 Collier Adult 55 & Over Winter · Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.33 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-03-07vs Olde Cypress - NavarroLost 01
L#2 DoublesDorothea Farmer / Carole Sloan vs Susanne Navarro / Diana Heckert3-6, 6-7
2024-02-29vs Pelican Bay Park - HaasWon 10
W#3 DoublesDorothea Farmer / Susie Beaudet vs Beth Schomp / Claudia Hammon6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2024-02-22vs Fiddlers Creek - WorkmanLost 01
L#2 DoublesJan Jackman / Dorothea Farmer vs Donna Burns / Barbara Country6-2, 6-7, 0-1
2024-02-08vs Island Walk - SchmidtWon 10
W#2 DoublesPeggy Keigley / Lucinda Winzenried vs Linda Hermann / Sue Schmidt6-1, 6-2
2024-01-18vs Royal Poinciana - SimmonsLost 02
L#1 DoublesMia Delk / Susie Beaudet vs Joan Roehr / Caroline Rogers4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLucinda Winzenried / Dorothea Farmer vs Mary Ann Moschner / Debra Stepan7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2024-01-11vs COLLIER/Sacks/55&over7.0WLost 02
L#1 DoublesSusie Beaudet / Mia Delk vs Ricki Giersch / Dana Sacks4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDorothea Farmer / Dale Zumsande vs Lisa Campbell / Inge Lund4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Susie Beaudet
published
3.27
Nada Uzelac
published
3.24
Kelly Lord
published
3.23
Mia Delk
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Linda Keely
published
3.18
Jan Jackman
published
3.17
Jennifer Bauer
published
3.12
Dorothea Farmer
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.71
Carole Sloan
published 3
Cheryl Planck
published
Kelly Bissetta
published
Peggy Keigley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sharon Swafford
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Peggy Keigley + Dorothea Farmer8552% gamesnot enough data
Dorothea Farmer + Jan Jackman134 matchesnot enough data
Linda Keely + Sharon Swafford123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Susie Beaudet
19W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%86%13%
3.35
Nada Uzelac
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.27
Kelly Lord
23W–27L career · no lines in 2024
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Mia Delk
270W–304L career · 2 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.23
Linda Keely
11W–22L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.18
Jan Jackman
12W–34L career · no lines in 2024
9%91%1%
3.18
Jennifer Bauer
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Dorothea Farmer
99W–84L career · 5 lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.12
3
Carole Sloan
9W–26L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%1%
2.71
Cheryl Planck
22W–13L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kelly Bissetta
9W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Peggy Keigley
92W–58L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Sharon Swafford
16W–9L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.