Teams

Jack Russell - Burley

2025 Duval Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0 Mixed 40 & Over

16 players · average NTRP 3.46 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-01-30vs Glen Kernan - MirjankarWon 21
L#1 DoublesGary Carlee / Arzikia Curry vs Miguel Bejar / Cheryl Matthews2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesGreg Burley / Kari Dodak vs Renard Rawls / Michelle Rawls6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesEric Minemier / Anne Hoover vs Rajul Parikh / Christi Bisson6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Mixed 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
3.77
Eric Minemier
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Arzikia Curry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.32
Carey Johnson
published 3.5
3.30
Kari Dodak
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Greg Burley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Alla Mikhaylenko
published 3.5
3.20
Georgi Kirov
published 3.5
2.96
Christie Ginter
published 3.5
2.95
Anne Hoover
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.91
Brian Nicholas
published 3
David Chau
published 3
2.70
Gary Carlee
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Merlin Ohmer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Sarah Houpert
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Shaun Ginter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eric Minemier + Kari Dodak9161% games+5.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Irena Eneva-Kirov
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.92
4
Eric Minemier
12W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Arzikia Curry
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Carey Johnson
12W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.32
Kari Dodak
19W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Greg Burley
10W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Alla Mikhaylenko
0W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Georgi Kirov
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Christie Ginter
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
2.96
3
Anne Hoover
10W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Brian Nicholas
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.91
3
David Chau
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Gary Carlee
2W–6L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
6%93%1%
2.70
Merlin Ohmer
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Sarah Houpert
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Shaun Ginter
7W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.