Teams

SD 3.5 SDTRC/ Monzon (2/2)

2021 Adult 40 & Over Summer - SD · SD - Women - WD 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.62 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-08-03vs SD 3.5 LJB&TC/ Young (2/2)Won 10
W#2 DoublesLorena Monzon / Kristan Hanson vs Jinny Hamilton Pace / Paige Kratz6-1, 6-0
2021-07-27vs SD 3.5 Mtn View / Louis (2/2)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesErica Meyer / Kristan Hanson vs Lilyan Ruiz / Diana Meskimen3-6, 1-6
2021-07-20vs SD LLW 3.5 Mtn View/ KilleenLost 01
L#2 DoublesKristan Hanson / Lorena Monzon vs Julie Wunderly / Michiyo Killeen4-6, 3-6
2021-07-13vs SD 3.5 Mtn View/ Padilla (2/2)Won 10
W#1 DoublesLorena Monzon / Kristan Hanson vs Aida Padilla / Kathie Angione6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKristan Hanson / Erica Meyer vs Hayley Connors / Samantha Nelson6-0, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD - Women - WD 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Sandy Dielman
published 4
3.89
Kerry Ott
published
3.48
Mary Garvey
published
3.42
Krista Losito
published 4
3.39
Ana Mariela Gamiz
published 3.5
3.29
Sandra Angel
published
3.25
Irene Steinwinder
published 3.5
3.24
Erica Meyer
published 3.5
3.24
Kristan Hanson
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.19
Heather Ravenscroft
published 3.5
2.98
Lorena Monzon
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ana Mariela Gamiz + Mary Garvey10357% games+6.4% vs expected
Irene Steinwinder + Erica Meyer111748% games−3.7% vs expected
Lorena Monzon + Kristan Hanson91051% gamesnot enough data
Irene Steinwinder + Krista Losito8459% gamesnot enough data
Lorena Monzon + Erica Meyer3644% gamesnot enough data
Kristan Hanson + Erica Meyer4257% gamesnot enough data
Lorena Monzon + Irene Steinwinder033 matchesnot enough data
Lorena Monzon + Sandy Dielman303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Sandy Dielman
165W–103L career · no lines in 2021
<1%72%28%
3.92
Kerry Ott
14W–21L career · no lines in 2021
80%20%<1%
3.89
Mary Garvey
21W–14L career · no lines in 2021
<1%56%44%
3.48
4
Krista Losito
61W–54L career · type A · no lines in 2021
74%26%<1%
3.42
3.5
Ana Mariela Gamiz
20W–12L career · no lines in 2021
<1%81%19%
3.39
Sandra Angel
6W–3L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
Irene Steinwinder
71W–69L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Erica Meyer
69W–74L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Kristan Hanson
79W–58L career · 5 lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Heather Ravenscroft
5W–3L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Lorena Monzon
68W–95L career · no lines in 2021
56%44%<1%
2.98

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.