Teams

Pongsugree

2023 Shenandoah Adult 55 & Over Women · Shenandoah Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.25 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2023-03-16Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKristen Roberts / Sharon DiRenzo vs Nadine DuFour / Rita Romano6-4, 1-4
2023-03-07Won 10
W#1 DoublesPamela Nix / April Providakes vs Christine Driscoll / Lauren Woolcott6-1, 6-3
2023-02-21Won 10
W#3 DoublesPamela Nix / Kerry Smith vs Donna Hopkins / Carol Rafter4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-02-16Won 10
W#2 DoublesSharon DiRenzo / Kimianne Lee vs Carolyn Matthews / Gabrielle Shearer6-0, 6-0
2023-02-14Lost 01
L#1 DoublesPamela Nix / April Providakes vs Cecile Boyle / Tae Wills4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2023-02-07vs LeasSplit 11
W#1 DoublesPamela Nix / Kate Putt vs Melissa Hutcheson / Sibyll Jones6-2, 0-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMaureen Bornholdt / Sharon DiRenzo vs Jennifer Yoon / Theresa Manion6-7, 1-6
2023-01-25Won 10
W#1 DoublesSharon DiRenzo / Kimianne Lee vs Rita Romano / Nadine DuFour6-0, 6-3
2023-01-19Won 10
W#2 DoublesSharon DiRenzo / Kimianne Lee vs Judy Rector / Deborah Williams6-0, 6-0
2023-01-17vs LeasWon 10
W#1 DoublesPamela Nix / Paige Fishel vs Sibyll Jones / Ramona Batchelder6-1, 6-1
2023-01-10vs Acing GracefullySplit 11
W#1 DoublesPamela Nix / April Providakes vs Donna Lee / Mary Saunders6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMaureen Bornholdt / Sharon DiRenzo vs Carol Rafter / Page Groseclose4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Shenandoah Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Paige Fishel
published
3.40
Lisa Wolff
published
3.38
Maureen Bornholdt
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.27
Pamela Nix
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.20
Mary Krueger
published
3.19
Kerry Smith
published
3.19
Kate Putt
published
3.08
2.70
Sharon DiRenzo
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.59
Angela Hoffman
published 3
Tina Woods
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maureen Bornholdt + Sharon DiRenzo5648% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Paige Fishel
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%1%
3.65
Lisa Wolff
7W–6L career · no lines in 2023
76%24%<1%
3.40
3.5
Maureen Bornholdt
72W–133L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Pamela Nix
193W–201L career · 6 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
Mary Krueger
17W–7L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.20
Kerry Smith
16W–17L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.19
Kate Putt
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.19
Margaret Amy Flaherty
5W–10L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.08
3
Sharon DiRenzo
103W–140L career · 6 lines in 2023
8%90%1%
2.70
3
Angela Hoffman
1W–9L career · no lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
2.59
Tina Woods
16W–13L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.