Teams

GTC GREEN

2023 CTA WOMEN'S DAYTIME DOUBLES - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - DAYTIME

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-06-20vs SKY REDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCarrie Wysong / Mary Deluccia vs Joy Kathleen Murphy / Heather Bacon7-5, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDeborah Alper / Kristin Nelson vs Marcy Howey / Barbara Chadwick6-2, 6-1
2023-06-13vs CM YELLOWWon 10
W#2 DoublesCarrie Wysong / Deborah Alper vs Taylor Pardun / Angela Dellasalle6-2, 7-5
2023-06-06vs DTC GREENSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCarrie Wysong / Mary Deluccia vs Annette Isham / Katherine Samuelson6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesKristin Nelson / Deborah Alper vs Kimberly Montgomery / Kristin Bokelman3-6, 1-6
2023-05-30vs DCC NAVYLost 01
L#1 DoublesMary Deluccia / Kimi Davis vs Lindsay Filsinger / Emily O'Shaughnessy6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2023-05-23vs CACM REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesTia Wolkov / Julie Groves vs Rachel Nutt / Sara Vanek1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMary Deluccia / Kimi Davis vs Sarah Bailey / Ashley Bawcum6-1, 1-6, 0-1
2023-05-16vs CHCC GREENLost 01
L#1 DoublesKimi Davis / Mary Deluccia vs Holly Strandes / Dananne Solomon2-6, 6-7
2023-05-09vs CACM GREENSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKimi Davis / Mary Deluccia vs Pallavi Marulasiddappa / Cathy O'Neill3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Walker / Tia Wolkov vs Lisa Snider / Diane Mapes6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - DAYTIME have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Sue Hickey
published
3.43
Tia Wolkov
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.37
Kristin Nelson
published
3.29
Mary Deluccia
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.27
Kimi Davis
published
3.25
Deborah Alper
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Carrie Wysong
published 3.5
3.06
Julie Groves
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Deluccia + Kristin Nelson2346% gamesnot enough data
Mary Deluccia + Deborah Alper213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sue Hickey
26W–13L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.76
3.5
Tia Wolkov
108W–37L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
3.43
Kristin Nelson
43W–36L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%18%
3.37
3.5
Mary Deluccia
147W–104L career · 6 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.29
Kimi Davis
16W–10L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Deborah Alper
156W–82L career · 3 lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Carrie Wysong
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Julie Groves
6W–10L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
3.06

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.