Teams

Elcock

2023 Anne Arundel Adult 40 & Over · Anne Arundel Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-08-06vs CaseyWon 10
W#1 DoublesJose Toro / William Ravekes vs Henry Jenkins / Kudzai Mukushi7-6, 6-3
2023-07-26vs CaseySplit 11
L#1 DoublesDavid Djajaputra / Mark Lapointe vs Jeffery Tolliver / Russell Hester3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMichael Duplechain / Jose Toro vs Kudzai Mukushi / Henry Jenkins6-3, 7-5
2023-07-18vs CaseySplit 11
L#2 DoublesChris Elcock / William Ravekes vs Jeffery Tolliver / Russell Hester3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMichael Duplechain / Shawn Reese vs Kudzai Mukushi / Henry Jenkins6-2, 6-4
2023-07-13vs CaseySplit 11
L#2 DoublesShawn Reese / David Djajaputra vs Jeffery Tolliver / Russell Hester3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMichael Duplechain / Chris Elcock vs Kudzai Mukushi / Desmond LaMar1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-07-08vs CaseySplit 11
L#1 DoublesJose Toro / Michael Duplechain vs John Burns / Bill Keating2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDavid Djajaputra / Mark Lapointe vs Russell Hester / Henry Jenkins6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2023-07-01vs CaseyWon 10
W#3 DoublesMichael Duplechain / Jose Toro vs Franklin Little / Kudzai Mukushi6-2, 6-3
2023-06-26vs CaseyWon 20
W#1 DoublesMark Lapointe / David Djajaputra vs Charlie JONES / Kudzai Mukushi6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesChris Elcock / Michael Duplechain vs Desmond LaMar / Scott Womack7-5, 6-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Anne Arundel Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.12
David Djajaputra
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.12
William Ravekes
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.08
Shawn Reese
published
2.92
Kenneth Whaley
published
2.86
Jose Toro
published
2.81
Michael Duplechain
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.74
Chris Elcock
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Djajaputra + Jose Toro5258% games+5.1% vs expected
Michael Duplechain + William Ravekes404 matchesnot enough data
David Djajaputra + Chris Elcock303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
David Djajaputra
137W–206L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%19%81%
3.12
3
William Ravekes
120W–88L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%19%81%
3.12
Shawn Reese
7W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%29%71%
3.08
Kenneth Whaley
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
2.92
Jose Toro
30W–67L career · no lines in 2023
1%84%15%
2.86
3
Michael Duplechain
72W–60L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%89%9%
2.81
3
Chris Elcock
6W–12L career · no lines in 2023
4%92%3%
2.74

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.