Teams

LVSampoornam/CSD

2022 Lake USTA 18 & Over League · Men 4.0 Tuesday pm

10 players · average NTRP 3.83 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-05-03vs LJLA-Lands/CSDWon 10
W#1 DoublesThomas Stephen / Hyo Rhee vs Jason Lands / Todd Krieg6-3, 6-2
2022-04-26vs LRCA-Caballero/NMP 18sLost 01
L#2 DoublesMarshall Horsman / Tyler Slabaugh vs Jeff Page / Neil White4-6, 3-6
2022-04-19vs LKHaynes/Westport 18s 4.0 TuesWon 10
W#3 DoublesTyler Slabaugh / Jon Schrand vs Ron Barbagli / Corey Cornacchio4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-04-18vs LSSR-Sree/NMP/4018+Lost 02
L#1 DoublesJon Schrand / Tyler Slabaugh vs Sreejith Sreedharan / Ragu Gopalan4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesThomas Stephen / Hyo Rhee vs Scott Wiley / Wes Williams2-6, 3-6
2022-03-29vs LJLA-Lands/CSDWon 30
W#1 DoublesTyler Slabaugh / Walter Ortiz vs Peter Bonhag / Christopher Purcell4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 SinglesJon Schrand vs Todd Krieg6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesThomas Stephen / Hyo Rhee vs JaMarr Funderburg / Trevor Klein6-7, 7-5, 1-0
2022-03-22vs LRCA-Caballero/NMP 18sLost 01
L#2 DoublesJon Schrand / Tyler Slabaugh vs Ken Peppercorn / Mark Robson2-6, 3-6
2022-03-15vs LKHaynes/Westport 18s 4.0 TuesSplit 11
L#2 DoublesHyo Rhee / Tyler Slabaugh vs Andrew Orr / Ron Barbagli0-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesJon Schrand vs Micah Robbins4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-03-01vs LSSR-Sree/NMP/4018+Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJon Schrand / Tyler Slabaugh vs Scott Wiley / Dewey Baker3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 4.0 Tuesday pm have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Jon Schrand
usually #1 Singles 30%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.90
3.76
Tyler Slabaugh
usually #3 Doubles 36%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 4
3.66
Walter Ortiz
published
3.45
Paul Thompson
published
3.44
Todd Larsen
published
3.37
Hyo Rhee
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.32
Thomas Stephen
published
3.12
Mark Olson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jon Schrand + Tyler Slabaugh10654% games+0.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jon Schrand
115W–73L career · 9 lines in 2022
<1%51%49%
4.00
Venkatesh Sampoornam
20W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%21%
3.90
4
Tyler Slabaugh
72W–37L career · 10 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.76
Walter Ortiz
23W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%11%89%
3.66
Paul Thompson
8W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
3.45
Todd Larsen
20W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Hyo Rhee
118W–94L career · 10 lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.37
Thomas Stephen
8W–13L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
Mayilvaganan Kasipandi
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.12
Mark Olson
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.