Teams

ACAC Hall

2024 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Weekend Men

9 players · average NTRP 4.30 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-06-02vs Captain Morgan's Stand at MTCWon 10
W#3 DoublesJason Voigt / Scott Kim vs Yong Ko / Craig Morgan6-2, 7-6
2024-05-19vs MidAtlantic/Bond/Adult18&Over4.5MLost 02
L#2 DoublesJason Voigt / Ben Hall vs Doug Bond / Glenn Diersen4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKeith Adams / Nathan Arland vs John DiNardi / Naveen Chennupati2-6, 0-6
2024-05-12vs Westwood 4.5 GodseyLost 02
L#1 DoublesMajd Babik / Ramzi Talhouk vs Carter King / George Simonton2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesBen Hall / David Nedeff vs Jonathan Fogle / Richard Godsey0-6, 2-6
2024-05-11vs Woodlake PattersonSplit 11
L#2 DoublesBen Hall / Stuart Fulcher vs Drew Lineberger / Wieslaw Gumulak3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJason Voigt / Scott Kim vs Tommy Bader / Michael Cabral6-3, 7-5
2024-04-28vs MRTC Battery Park SpivackLost 01
L#1 DoublesScott Kim / Jason Voigt vs Marsh Baker / Jimmy Qing5-7, 4-6
2024-04-14vs MAC SnowSplit 11
W#1 DoublesStuart Fulcher / Scott Kim vs Allen Huang / Mycael McDowell6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesKeith Adams / Jason Voigt vs John Bennett / Adam Hamilton5-7, 1-6
2024-04-06vs RidgeTop LefkowitzLost 01
L#1 DoublesJason Voigt / Nathan Arland vs David Lefkowitz / Thomas Mitchell2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Weekend Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.93 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Stuart Fulcher
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.08
Ramzi Talhouk
published
4.02
Jason Voigt
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.01
Scott Kim
published
3.98
Nathan Arland
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.87
Majd Babik
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.77
Keith Adams
published
3.76
Gabriel Venturi
published
3.72
David Nedeff
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #2 Singles 14% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Scott Kim + Jason Voigt123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Stuart Fulcher
149W–170L career · 2 lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
4.12
Ramzi Talhouk
3W–7L career · no lines in 2024
28%71%<1%
4.08
4.5
Jason Voigt
75W–93L career · 6 lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
4.02
Scott Kim
4W–19L career · no lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
4.01
4.5
Nathan Arland
82W–79L career · 2 lines in 2024
55%45%<1%
3.98
4
Majd Babik
202W–105L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%81%18%
3.87
Keith Adams
15W–11L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
Gabriel Venturi
3W–9L career · no lines in 2024
96%4%<1%
3.76
4
David Nedeff
98W–74L career · 7 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.72

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.