Teams

GSTL65/Lawrence/Prestwick

2026 Combo 65 & Over - GSTL · Adult WOMEN - 6.5

11 players · average NTRP / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 upcoming · 1 played
Sep 13 3:00 PM
Prestwick Tennis Club
Sep 27 3:00 PM
Prestwick Tennis Club
Oct 4 3:30 PM
Surf Golf & Beach Club
Oct 11 3:00 PM
Prestwick Tennis Club
2026-09-03vs GSTL65/Leroux/SurfLost 12
L#1 DoublesLee Ann Bundrick / Debby Brooks vs Kathy Hedgecock / Lisa Leroux1-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesLana Hudson / Vera Reznik vs Tonya Fitzgerald / Patti Bridgeman1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesLynn Logan / Marian Pavy vs Cheri McLeod / Lauren Godwin6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Adult WOMEN - 6.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GSTL65/Lawrence/Prestwick000000
2GSTL65/Leroux/Surf000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Gay Lawrimore
published
3.11
Lynn Logan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Lee Ann Bundrick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Lana Hudson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Jan Dieter
published
2.83
Marian Pavy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.76
Melinda Hyman
published
2.63
Jill Merhar
published
2.55
Margaret Phillips
published
2.45
Vera Reznik
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Svetlana Wilson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lana Hudson + Gay Lawrimore3249% games−11.3% vs expected
Jan Dieter + Lee Ann Bundrick134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Gay Lawrimore
6W–5L career · no lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
Lynn Logan
7W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
22%77%<1%
3.11
Lee Ann Bundrick
5W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.10
Lana Hudson
4W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
44%56%<1%
3.02
Jan Dieter
1W–6L career · no lines in 2026
86%14%<1%
2.85
Marian Pavy
3W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
Melinda Hyman
9W–8L career · no lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.76
Jill Merhar
2W–3L career · no lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
2.63
Margaret Phillips
5W–9L career · no lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
2.55
Vera Reznik
0W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
65%35%<1%
2.45
Svetlana Wilson
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.