Teams

Miami-Dade/Cecchi

2022 Miami-Dade Adult 18 & Over - Spring - Night · 2.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women

4 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-05-06vs Lee's Angels (Coral Reef/Bagayas)Won 20
W#1 DoublesMarjorie Cecchi / Maylu Hernandez vs Mary Cagle / Stephanie Murillo7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesHALINA de PAWLIKOWSKI / Cecilia Aguirre vs Raquel Bagayas / Claudia Hoechner7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2022-05-04vs TeamForman (Riviera Prep)Won 10
W#1 SinglesMarjorie Cecchi vs Jessica Rojas6-4, 6-4
2022-04-23vs Porras (Moore Park)Won 20
W#1 DoublesMarjorie Cecchi / Ludys Lopez vs Isabelle Gregoire / Susan Bisnoff6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKatiria Peguero / Cecilia Aguirre vs Carol Valdivia / Martine Charles7-5, 6-3
2022-04-02vs TeamForman (Riviera Prep)Won 10
W#2 DoublesMarjorie Cecchi / Maylu Hernandez vs Nicky Goldner / Maritza Fernandez6-3, 7-5
2022-03-12Won 10
W#1 SinglesKatiria Peguero vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-03-05vs Lee's Angels (Coral Reef/Bagayas)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMarjorie Cecchi / Maylu Hernandez vs Mary Cagle / Simone Kriger3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2022-02-12vs TeamForman (Riviera Prep)Won 10
W#2 DoublesMaylu Hernandez / Marjorie Cecchi vs Allyssa Cili / Nicky Goldner6-2, 6-4
2022-01-29vs Porras (Moore Park)Won 10
W#1 DoublesMarjorie Cecchi / Katiria Peguero vs Debora JAMES / Susan Bisnoff6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Marjorie Cecchi
usually #1 Doubles 31%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published 3
2.96
Cecilia Aguirre
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.79
Katiria Peguero
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.39
Janeth Mendoza
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katiria Peguero + Marjorie Cecchi8456% games+12.4% vs expected
Cecilia Aguirre + Marjorie Cecchi13358% games+11.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Marjorie Cecchi
128W–69L career · 12 lines in 2022
<1%51%49%
3.00
3
Cecilia Aguirre
116W–62L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%61%39%
2.96
3
Katiria Peguero
77W–74L career · 10 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
2.79
Janeth Mendoza
0W–7L career · no lines in 2022
0%80%20%
2.39

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.