Teams

Woodside/Hules

2023 CSRATA USTA Adult 18 & Over - Spring '23 · Women 3.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.33 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.24
Kristen Elmshaeuser
published
3.16
Kristina Topp
published
3.12
Dee Dee Redd
published 3.5
3.07
Joy Hules
published
3.06
Kristen Burns
published
3.06
Christy Tyner
published 3.5
2.87
Kari DeLoach
published
2.75
Melissa Bunney
published
2.71
Helen Faulk
published
2.68
Angela Hodges
published 3
2.61
2.57
Paige Tiffany
published
2.50
Susan Jordan
published
Elizabeth Bushnell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dee Dee Redd + Christy Tyner4746% games−9.7% vs expected
Christy Tyner + Melissa Bunney1440% gamesnot enough data
Elizabeth Bushnell + Melissa Bunney134 matchesnot enough data
Kari DeLoach + Paige Tiffany303 matchesnot enough data
Angela Hodges + Helen Faulk123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristen Elmshaeuser
36W–20L career · no lines in 2023
4%92%3%
3.24
Kristina Topp
15W–28L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Dee Dee Redd
12W–18L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.12
Joy Hules
10W–19L career · no lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.07
Kristen Burns
17W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%32%68%
3.06
3.5
Christy Tyner
13W–16L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
3.06
Kari DeLoach
21W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%18%
2.87
Melissa Bunney
45W–56L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
2.75
Helen Faulk
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
2.71
3
Angela Hodges
4W–13L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
2.68
Melissa Lackey-Oremus
7W–14L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
2.61
Paige Tiffany
6W–15L career · no lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
2.57
Susan Jordan
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
2.50
Elizabeth Bushnell
5W–12L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.