Teams

Winner/G.Goetz

2023 Broward Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.70 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-03-21vs Jetc -RogersonSplit 11
W#2 DoublesDIANA TSU / Esther Lem vs Katherine Lavin / Tammy Gibson6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesClaudia Garcia / Diana Bastias vs Gabriela Hernandez Lavoy / Cecilia Pagotto4-6, 5-7
2023-02-22Won 10
W#3 DoublesEsther Lem / Diana Bastias vs Bethany Marten / Debbie Shalek6-2, 6-2
2023-02-15vs Midtown - MontserratWon 10
W#2 DoublesEsther Lem / DIANA TSU vs Adriana Montserrat / Anabella Este5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2023-02-01vs Veltri - ContrerasWon 20
W#2 DoublesDIANA TSU / Esther Lem vs Lissette Viloria / Monika Olimpiew6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDiana Bastias / Daniela Romay vs Robin Hayden / Sara Contreras7-5, 7-6
2023-01-25vs Sunrise - DominiqueWon 10
W#1 DoublesEsther Lem / DIANA TSU vs Janice Carter / Paulette Janice Snagg7-5, 7-6
2023-01-11vs Wrc GaudreauWon 10
W#2 DoublesDIANA TSU / Esther Lem vs Valeria Cisneros / Lucia Marroquin6-2, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Gina Goetz
published
3.75
Esther Lem
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.71
Daniela CASTILLO
published 4
3.55
Sandy Shapiro
published
3.29
Daniela Romay
published 3.5
3.10
Monica Rosenberg
published
3.06
Claudia Garcia
published 3.5
2.97
Diana Bastias
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gina Goetz + Esther Lem4170% games+15.3% vs expected
Diana Bastias + Claudia Garcia224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Gina Goetz
30W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%65%35%
3.95
4
Esther Lem
63W–43L career · 6 lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Daniela CASTILLO
7W–4L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.71
Sandy Shapiro
4W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%36%64%
3.55
3.5
Daniela Romay
29W–13L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.29
Monica Rosenberg
6W–13L career · no lines in 2023
23%76%<1%
3.10
3.5
Claudia Garcia
4W–14L career · no lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.06
3.5
Diana Bastias
38W–61L career · 3 lines in 2023
57%43%<1%
2.97

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.